Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rate control versus rhythm control--decision making.

D G Wyse1, Christopher S Simpson

  • 1Department of Cardiac Science, Libin Cardiovasular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta. dgwyse@ucalgary.ca

The Canadian Journal of Cardiology
|October 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scope and Outcome of Early Repolarization Syndrome in Unexplained Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the National HiRO Registry.

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Epinephrine Challenge: Long-Term Evaluation of Test Performance for the Evaluation of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest and Familial Sudden Death.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Author Corrections to: "Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2023 Guidelines on the Fitness to Drive [Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Volume 40, Issue 4 500-523, DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.033]".

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Safety, Utility, and Outcomes of Procainamide Challenge for the Diagnosis and Exclusion of Brugada Syndrome.

Circulation·2025
Same author

Driving Restrictions and Incapacitation Vulnerability Evaluation After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: DRIVE-STEMI Study.

Circulation·2025
Same author

Author Corrections to "Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2023 Guidelines on the Fitness to Drive" [Can J Cardiol 40 (2024):500-523].

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2024
Same journal

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Practical approach to the assessment of technical scanning skills in transthoracic echocardiography.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Cost-effectiveness of Pharmacist- and Nurse Practitioner-led Medication Management for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation to Preserve Ventricular Function.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Four-Chamber Myocardial Strain to Predict Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Choosing between rate-control and rhythm-control strategies for managing atrial fibrillation depends on individual patient factors. Neither strategy offers a clear advantage, emphasizing personalized treatment plans for optimal outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Reviews current data on rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies for atrial fibrillation management.
  • Highlights ongoing and completed clinical trials comparing these two primary therapeutic approaches.
  • Identifies existing gaps in the evidence base for atrial fibrillation treatment.

Framework:

  • Compares the efficacy and safety of rate-control and rhythm-control strategies.
  • Primarily focuses on pharmacological therapies due to their common use and available comparative data.
  • Analyzes trial results and subanalyses to inform strategy selection.

Implementation:

  • Recommends individualized selection of either rate-control or rhythm-control strategy.
  • Suggests considering patient preference and other clinical factors for personalized therapy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Advocates for flexibility in switching strategies or adopting non-pharmacological treatments if goals are unmet or adverse effects occur.

    • Implications:

    • Emphasizes that personalized medicine is key in atrial fibrillation management.
    • Suggests a paradigm shift towards individualized treatment selection over a one-size-fits-all approach.
    • Informs clinical decision-making for healthcare providers managing patients with atrial fibrillation.