Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Questionnaire for the mobbing risk: CDL2.0].

R Gilioli1, M G Cassitto, P Campanini

  • 1Consorzio ISPESL/ICP per il Centro di Collaborazione con l'Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità per la Medicina del Lavoro e l'Igiene Industriale, Clinica del Lavoro Luigi Devoto, Milano. omscons@unimi.it

Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia
|October 26, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in oral health status between cancer patients: a case-control observational study.

BMC oral health·2025
Same author

Uncomplicated monochorionic twins: neurodevelopmental insights and implications.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2025
Same author

Anaphylaxis trend before and during pandemic: COVID-19 did not affect anaphylaxis frequency.

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2025
Same author

Severe chronic spontaneous urticaria responding and not responding to omalizumab: analysis of the prognostic value of known and novel in vitro variables.

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2024
Same author

Sinonasal cancer incidence in Lombardy, Italy, 2008-20.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Cytotoxicity effects and differentiation potential of ormocer-based and nanohybrid composite resins on human dental pulp stem cells.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2024
Same journal

Background Music in elderly nursing home: a feasibility explorative study.

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
Same journal

Needle stick injuries among nurses in Italy: a review.

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
Same journal

[Self-compassion and secondary traumatization: results of an observational study carried out in Covid hospital ordinary units].

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
Same journal

[Remote functional evaluation after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in amateur sportsmen with sedentary work].

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
Same journal

Communicating bad news: attitudes and modes of communication of the health professions.

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
Same journal

[Mortality study in a cohort of entertainment workers].

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2023
See all related articles

This study developed a reliable questionnaire to assess workplace mobbing risk. Five specific mobbing actions are sufficient to identify potential risks, aiding in early detection of harmful work environments.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Psychology
  • Workplace Safety

Background:

  • Mobbing, or workplace bullying, is a significant issue impacting employee well-being and organizational productivity.
  • Existing methods for assessing mobbing risk may lack comprehensive validation or ease of use.
  • There is a need for a reliable tool to identify and quantify the risk of mobbing in diverse workplace settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a questionnaire for evaluating the risk of workplace mobbing.
  • To establish the reliability and validity of the newly developed mobbing risk assessment tool.
  • To identify key indicators within the questionnaire that signify a potential mobbing situation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a multiple-choice questionnaire with specific items designed to detect mobbing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administration of the questionnaire to two distinct groups: 243 subjects experiencing mobbing and 63 subjects not exposed to mobbing.
  • Statistical analysis of the scores obtained from both groups to determine questionnaire validity and reliability.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed questionnaire demonstrated significant validity and reliability in distinguishing between individuals exposed and not exposed to mobbing.
    • Analysis indicated that the presence of five specific mobbing actions is a sufficient criterion to define a workplace as potentially at risk.
    • The study confirmed the questionnaire's capability to detect mobbing situations, even with noted limitations in sample selection.

    Conclusions:

    • The validated questionnaire serves as a practical tool for detecting workplace mobbing.
    • The identification of five key mobbing actions provides a clear benchmark for risk assessment.
    • Further refinement of sample selection is recommended to enhance the generalizability of future findings, though the current tool is effective.