Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Delivery of Cardioactive Therapeutics in a Porcine Myocardial Infarction Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
Closure of the pericardium using synthetic bioabsorbable polymers
Kei Sakuma1, Atsushi Iguchi, Yoshito Ikada
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. ksakuma@mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp
This study compared absorbable pericardial substitutes (gelatin and L-C copolymer) with expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE). Gelatin sheets showed less adhesion and inflammation, offering a potentially safer alternative for pericardial repair.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Innovation
- Tissue Engineering
Background:
- Pericardial substitutes are crucial for safer reoperation after cardiac surgery.
- Expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) is a common synthetic pericardial substitute but can cause adverse inflammatory reactions and fibrosis.
- Investigating absorbable alternatives is essential to mitigate these risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the absorption rate and tissue response of two novel absorbable pericardial substitutes: gelatin and L-lactic acid-epsilon-caprolactone copolymer (L-C copolymer).
- To compare these absorbable materials against a widely used e-PTFE sheet and autologous pericardium in a canine model.
Main Methods:
- Sixty dogs underwent pericardial defect repair using either autologous pericardium, gelatin sheet, L-C copolymer sheet, or e-PTFE sheet.
- Implanted materials were retrieved at various time points (2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks) for analysis.
- Tissue reaction, including inflammation and adhesion, was assessed.
Main Results:
- The e-PTFE group exhibited severe adhesions to the heart and pleura, along with a pronounced inflammatory response.
- Both gelatin and L-C copolymer sheets were fully absorbed by 24 weeks post-implantation.
- Absorbable substitutes were replaced by regenerated fibrous tissue.
Conclusions:
- Gelatin sheets demonstrated significantly less adhesion and reduced inflammatory reactions compared to e-PTFE.
- Absorbable pericardial substitutes, particularly gelatin, present a promising alternative to e-PTFE, potentially improving outcomes in cardiac surgery.
- Further research into absorbable biomaterials for pericardial reconstruction is warranted.
More Related Videos
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
06:15A Hydrogel Construct and Fibrin-based Glue Approach to Deliver Therapeutics in a Murine Myocardial Infarction Model.
Published on: June 14, 2015