Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Converging pathways: a journey toward quality case management.

,

    The Case Manager
    |October 26, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article explores how case management evolved into a more structured profession, largely due to the efforts of organizations like URAC. Established in 1990, URAC initially focused on improving utilization review but later expanded to include accreditation for various medical management functions, including case management. Today, URAC offers 17 accreditation programs that help standardize practices in the field. The study highlights how these developments addressed a key gap in quality assurance and professional standards for case management.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    Newsbytes.

    The Case manager·2020
    Same journal

    Newsbytes.

    The Case manager·2020
    Same journal

    In-home behavioral health case management: an integrated model for high-risk populations.

    The Case manager·2006
    Same journal

    Alcohol in the older population, Part 2: MAST you speak the truth in an AUDIT or are you too CAGE-y?

    The Case manager·2006
    Same journal

    Transforming the traditional discharge planning manual.

    The Case manager·2006
    Same journal

    Promoting patient safety: one company's example.

    The Case manager·2006

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare quality assurance
    • Case management in clinical practice
    • Professional accreditation standards

    Background:

    Until the late 20th century, case management lacked formal structures to ensure consistent quality. Prior research had shown that medical management practices varied widely across institutions. No prior work had resolved how to standardize these practices. That uncertainty drove the creation of organizations focused on quality and accountability. It was already known that utilization review was a key area needing oversight. However, the field of case management remained underdeveloped in terms of professional standards. This gap motivated the formation of organizations like URAC. The need for accreditation became more pressing as case management expanded in scope.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this analysis is to trace the evolution of case management as a profession. It focuses on how quality assurance emerged as a central concern. The specific problem addressed is the lack of standardized practices in case management. The motivation stems from the need to understand how organizations like URAC shaped the field. It was already known that accountability was a major challenge in medical management. This paper explores how accreditation programs helped address that challenge. The study highlights the role of URAC in expanding beyond utilization review. It also examines the broader impact of these programs on case management practices.

    Keywords:
    case management standardsURAC accreditationmedical management qualitycase management evolution

    Frequently Asked Questions

    URAC was established in 1990 to improve utilization review but later expanded to include case management accreditation among its 17 current programs.

    Initially focused on utilization review, URAC expanded to cover broader medical management functions, including case management and disease management.

    Accreditation ensures standardized practices and accountability, which the authors suggest became central to professionalizing case management.

    The number 17 refers to the total number of accreditation programs URAC currently offers in medical management.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The approach taken in this study is a historical review of professional developments in case management. The primary tool used is an analysis of URAC’s role in shaping quality standards. The focus is on the organization’s evolution from 1990 onward. The study draws on public records of URAC’s accreditation programs. It uses a chronological framework to show how the organization expanded its scope. The review includes a discussion of the 17 current accreditation programs. The approach avoids speculative claims about future directions. Instead, it emphasizes documented changes in professional standards.

    Main Results:

    The strongest finding is the establishment of URAC in 1990 to improve utilization review. The organization later expanded to include case management accreditation. By today, URAC offers 17 distinct accreditation programs. These programs cover a wide range of medical management functions. The data shows a clear shift from utilization review to broader case management. The expansion reflects growing recognition of quality assurance needs. The results suggest that URAC played a pivotal role in professionalizing case management. The evidence supports the idea that accreditation became a key driver of quality improvements.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that URAC’s growth reflects the need for standardized case management. They suggest that accreditation programs helped define professional boundaries. The synthesis indicates that quality assurance became central to the field’s development. The implications point to the importance of organizational frameworks in shaping practice. The authors state that URAC’s expansion was a response to industry demands. They propose that accreditation improved accountability in medical management. The findings trace a clear path from utilization review to broader case management. The authors suggest that these developments have had lasting effects on professional standards.

    Utilization review is a medical management function that involves assessing the necessity and appropriateness of healthcare services.

    The authors propose that URAC’s expansion reflects growing industry needs for quality assurance in case management.