Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Evaluation of Photosynthetic Behaviors by Simultaneous Measurements of Leaf Reflectance and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analyses
Published on: August 9, 2019
The low-light reduction in the quantum yield of photosynthesis: potential errors and biases when calculating the
Zackary Johnson1, Richard T Barber
1MIT Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 48-336A, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA, zij@mit.edu.
Abstract:
Photosynthesis-irradiance (P-E) curves are widely used to describe photosynthetic efficiency and potential. Contemporary models assume maximal photosynthetic quantum yield (phi) at low irradiances. But P-E observations made with both oxygen evolution and carbon uptake techniques show that this is not always the case. Using new and published data in conjunction with modeling exercises, we demonstrate that regardless of the mechanism there can be reductions in phi at low irradiances that are not readily observable using conventional P-E analyses. We also show that analytical errors, such as inaccurate estimation of dark oxygen consumption or carbon uptake, can markedly affect the structure of phi-E curves with negligible effect on P-E curve structure. Whether from respiration ;corrections' or other mechanisms, these deviations in phi at low light levels from the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis (phi(max)) can lead to significant errors (> 50%) in the estimation of the linear portion of the P-E curve and ultimately phi(max). Non-linear models of P-E, such as the rectangular hyperbola, quadratic, exponential and hyperbolic tangent that are commonly used to estimate the initial slope (alpha) of the P-E curve assume that phi is maximal at low light levels and therefore can err in the estimation of phi(max) when phi is reduced at low light levels. Using a diverse data set of 622 P-E curves with a total of 7623 points, we show that although model skills are high (r (2) = 0.96 +/- 0.05, 0.97 +/- 0.04, 0.97 +/- 0.04 and 0.97 +/- 0.04, respectively), a large fraction of the model-predicted phi(max) differ by greater than 10% from true phi(max) values (91%, 50%, 82% and 46%, respectively). Data from these observations and modeling exercises lead us to suggest that phi(max) be determined by directly estimating the true maximum of a phi-E curve rather than using the more conventional methodology employing the initial slope of the P-E curve.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Calvin Benson Cycle
The Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Photosynthesis
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence

