Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What is so odd about odds?

Bernard Montreuil1, Yves Bendavid, James Brophy

  • 1Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Que. bernard.montreuil@umontreal.ca

Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal Canadien De Chirurgie
|October 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical Management of Recurrent Gastrojejunocolic Fistula With Gastric Antrectomy and Bilateral Vagotomy.

Case reports in surgery·2026
Same author

Predicting death or readmission following heart failure hospitalisation: the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.

Open heart·2025
Same author

2024 Canadian Surgery Forum: Sept. 25-28, 2024.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2024
Same author

Impact of deep neuromuscular blockade on intraoperative NOL-guided remifentanil requirement during desflurane anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries: A randomised controlled trial.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2024
Same author

Clinical Risk Assessment and Prediction in Congenital Heart Disease Across the Lifespan: JACC Scientific Statement.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2024
Same author

In symptomatic AF with end-stage HF, adding catheter ablation to medical therapy improved clinical outcomes at 18 mo.

Annals of internal medicine·2023

The odds ratio (OR) is often misinterpreted as the risk ratio (RR) in clinical studies, especially for common outcomes. This misinterpretation can significantly amplify the perceived strength of associations, leading to biased conclusions in research.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Relative event likelihood in clinical studies is often reported as risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR).
  • Risk ratio (RR) offers intuitive interpretation, while odds ratio (OR) interpretation is complex and prone to misinterpretation.
  • Odds ratio (OR) can differ substantially from RR, particularly with common outcomes, leading to potential biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify controversial issues surrounding the use and interpretation of the odds ratio (OR).
  • To illustrate theoretical concepts of ORs with examples from surgical literature.
  • To assess the prevalence and impact of OR misinterpretation as RR in published research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of articles published in five surgical journals over a five-year period.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how odds ratios (OR) were presented and interpreted in relation to risk ratios (RR).
  • Theoretical explanation of the mathematical relationship and discrepancies between OR and RR.

    • Main Results:

    • The odds ratio (OR) is frequently presented and misinterpreted as equivalent to the risk ratio (RR) in surgical literature.
    • This misinterpretation is more pronounced when the outcome of interest is common.
    • Uncritical use of OR as an estimate of RR can amplify the apparent strength of associations.

    Conclusions:

    • Misinterpretation of the odds ratio (OR) as the risk ratio (RR) is a significant issue in clinical research.
    • This leads to biased inferences regarding treatment effects and disease causality.
    • Accurate understanding and reporting of OR are crucial for valid scientific conclusions.