Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

F J Carter1, M P Schijven, R Aggarwal

  • 1The Cuschieri Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland. f.j.carter@dundee.ac.uk

Surgical Endoscopy
|October 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary

A review of surgical simulators found a lack of rigorous validation studies. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) work group recommends updating guidelines regularly due to new devices and research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of surgery in oncological trials: the patient's perspective.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

Peritoneal resident macrophages constitute an immunosuppressive environment in peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Correction: The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2025
Same author

A proposed framework of strategies to overcome challenges to surgical quality assurance in oncology trials (SQA-Onc.).

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

The effect of virtual reality therapy on pain and anxiety during wound care in adults: A systematic review.

Heliyon·2024
Same author

The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Simulation and Training
  • Surgical Education Technology Evaluation

Background:

  • The European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) established a Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes.
  • This group aimed to review existing validation evidence for surgical simulators to inform consensus guidelines.

Framework:

  • A systematic review of validation evidence was conducted for six surgical simulators available as of July 2004.
  • Simulators were categorized into laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy systems.
  • Clinical guidelines criteria were applied to rate the validation evidence for each simulator.

Implementation:

  • The consensus rated the evidence for validation and assigned recommendation levels to each simulator system.
  • A significant lack of published validation studies employing rigorous experimental methodology was identified across most systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Level 2 recommendations were achieved for only a few selected simulator systems.

    • Implications:

    • The findings highlight the need for more robust validation research in surgical simulation technology.
    • The EAES work group commits to regular updates of these consensus guidelines to reflect advancements in simulators and research.
    • Updated guidelines will be accessible on the EAES website to support informed adoption of surgical training tools.