Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A case-control study of blood group antigen expression in Babesia microti infected patients in the United States.

Transfusion·2026
Same author

Evaluation of standard and modified two-tiered testing algorithms using well-characterized early Lyme disease samples.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2026
Same author

Fatal Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipient, Minnesota, USA.

Emerging infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Lyme Disease Biobank: 10 years of 3 month follow-up visits from 2014 to 2023.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Update on North American tick-borne diseases and how to diagnose them.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2025
Same author

Emerging babesiosis in the mid-Atlantic: autochthonous human babesiosis cases and Babesia microti (Piroplasmida: Babesiidae) in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and Ixodes keiransi (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks from Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia, 2009 to 2024.

Journal of medical entomology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Death certification errors at an academic institution.

Bobbi S Pritt1, Nicholas J Hardin, Jeffrey A Richmond

  • 1Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|October 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Death certificates frequently contain errors, with 34% of those reviewed having major inaccuracies in cause or manner of death. Implementing educational interventions can improve death certification accuracy.

More Related Videos

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Public Health
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Accurate death certificates are crucial for personal, epidemiological, and legal data.
  • Errors in death certification are common and can range in severity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the frequency and types of errors in death certificates issued by non-pathologist physicians.
  • Focus on a university-affiliated medical center setting.

Main Methods:

  • Review of 50 death certificates from patients who died without autopsy.
  • Comparison of original certificates with mock certificates created by pathologists.
  • Error grading on a scale of I to IV, with IV being most severe.

Main Results:

  • 72% had grade I, 32% grade II, and 30% grade III errors.
  • 34% of certificates contained grade IV errors (incorrect cause/manner of death).
  • 82% of reviewed certificates had multiple errors.

Conclusions:

  • A high rate of major (grade IV) death certification errors exists in academic settings.
  • Contributing factors include inexperience, fatigue, time constraints, and lack of familiarity.
  • Recommendations include annual training and case discussions to improve accuracy.