Related Experiment Videos
Does it matter what patients think? The relationship between changes in patients' beliefs about angina and their
Gill Furze1, Robert J P Lewin, Terje Murberg
1British Heart Foundation Care and Education Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. gf107@york.ac.uk
Objective:
The aim of this study is to examine the association between changes in misconceived or maladaptive beliefs about angina and patients' functional and psychological status.
Method:
The method used was a prospective follow-up study over 1 year of 133 people with angina.
Results:
Beliefs about angina were significantly associated with functional and psychological status. People with more misconceived or maladaptive beliefs were more anxious and physically limited than were people with fewer such beliefs, with differences in physical functioning that were clinically significant. Change in angina beliefs over 1 year was the most significant predictor for physical functioning at follow-up, after controlling for the effects of demographic variables and the outcome variable at baseline, whereas change in the frequency of angina did not contribute significantly to this model.
Conclusion:
Misconceived and maladaptive beliefs about angina are associated with reductions in both functional and psychological status. These beliefs are easily and quickly identified using a simple questionnaire and should be corrected.
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
The Placebo Effect
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: