Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control.

Neville A Stanton1, Mark S Young

  • 1School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. Neville.Stanton@brunel.ac.uk

Ergonomics
|October 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Healthcare staff fatigue: The unrecognised risk for patient safety.

Future healthcare journal·2025
Same author

Special issue celebrating the 75<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

Think Human: exploring the exhibition of ergonomics to enhance education and engagement: establishing the CIEHF 75<sup>th</sup> anniversary exhibition.

Ergonomics·2024
Same author

The effect of information integration on team communication in a simulated submarine control room task.

Ergonomics·2024
Same author

The Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors at 75: perspectives on contemporary challenges and future directions for Ergonomics and Human Factors.

Ergonomics·2024
Same author

When tomorrow comes: A prospective risk assessment of a future artificial general intelligence-based uncrewed combat aerial vehicle system.

Applied ergonomics·2024
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Quantity and thumbnail display effects on semi-autonomous ground vehicle operators' performance and mental workload: the moderating role of spatial ability.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) reduced driver stress and workload but did not affect locus of control or trust. ACC decreased situation awareness, suggesting a need for improved driver-vehicle communication.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Automotive Psychology
  • Driver Behavior Analysis

Background:

  • Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems are increasingly common in vehicles.
  • The psychological impact of ACC on drivers requires thorough investigation.
  • Potential effects include changes in perceived control, trust, workload, stress, and situation awareness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the psychological effects of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) on drivers.
  • To assess how ACC influences driver's sense of control, trust, workload, stress, and situation awareness.
  • To explore the impact of traffic density and ACC feedback on these psychological variables.

Main Methods:

  • A driving simulator study comparing manual driving with ACC.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Drivers experienced varying traffic conditions and ACC feedback levels.
  • Psychological variables including locus of control, trust, workload, stress, mental models, and situation awareness were measured using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

    • Main Results:

    • ACC did not significantly affect drivers' locus of control or trust in the vehicle.
    • ACC led to reductions in situation awareness, workload, and perceived stress.
    • The degree of ACC feedback and traffic workload influenced these psychological outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • While ACC can reduce stress and workload, it may diminish driver situation awareness.
    • Improvements in ACC feedback mechanisms are needed to enhance driver situation awareness.
    • Future ACC designs should focus on providing cues for trajectory prediction and conflict identification.