Related Experiment Videos
ACE inhibitors in heart failure: what more do we need to know?
Catherine Demers1, Anita Mody, Koon K Teo
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. demers@hhsc.ca
Insights
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) offer additional benefits in symptomatic HF patients, but ACE inhibitors remain the first-choice treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- ACE inhibitors have demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- Extended studies like X-SOLVD confirm survival benefits, with a notable reduction in all-cause death compared to placebo.
- High-dose ACE inhibitors, as shown in the ATLAS study, further reduce HF hospitalizations, even if not impacting all-cause mortality significantly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ACE inhibitors and explore the role of ARBs in managing heart failure and post-myocardial infarction patients.
- To assess the benefits of optimizing ACE inhibitor dosage and considering combination therapy with ARBs.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from large clinical trials including SOLVD, ATLAS, CHARM-Added, and VALIANT.
- Comparison of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and combination therapies in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure.
- Assessment of outcomes such as all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- ACE inhibitors significantly decrease cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalizations.
- High-dose lisinopril showed a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and a combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization.
- ARBs, such as candesartan, provide additional cardiovascular mortality reduction when added to standard HF therapy in symptomatic patients.
- Valsartan demonstrated comparable efficacy to captopril in post-MI patients with HF and may serve as an alternative for ACE inhibitor-intolerant individuals.
Conclusions:
- ACE inhibitors are the first-line therapy for patients post-myocardial infarction with LV systolic dysfunction.
- Combination therapy with ARBs may be considered for symptomatic HF patients to further reduce morbidity.
- Close monitoring of renal function and potassium is crucial when using ARBs.
- Evidence does not currently support ACE inhibitor use in HF with preserved LV systolic function.
Abstract:
ACE inhibitors have significantly decreased cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, the extended 12-year study of the SOLVD (Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Prevention and Treatment trials (X-SOLVD) demonstrated a significant benefit with a reduction of cumulative all-cause death compared with placebo (50.9% vs 56.4%) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.79, 0.93; p < 0.001]. The survival benefits and significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity related to treatment with ACE inhibitors are likely achieved by titrating the dose of ACE inhibitors to the target dose achieved in clinical trials. Although the ATLAS (Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril And Survival) study, which randomly allocated HF patients to low- or high-dose lisinopril, showed no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.03), the predetermined secondary combined outcome of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization was reduced by 15% for the patients receiving high-dose lisinopril compared with low-dose (p < 0.001) with a 24% reduction in HF hospitalization (p = 0.002). Despite the use of ACE inhibitors, blockade of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) remains incomplete, with evidence of continued production of angiotensin II by non-ACE-dependent pathways. The safety and potential benefits of angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) in patients with impaired systolic function have been assessed in moderate to large clinical trials. In patients with impaired LV systolic function and HF, combination therapy with ARBs with recommended HF therapy including ACE inhibitors in patients who remain symptomatic may be considered for its morbidity benefit. Based on the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity)-Added data, candesartan cilexetil in addition to standard HF therapy results in a further reduction of cardiovascular mortality. Close monitoring of renal function and serum potassium levels is needed in this setting. The VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarction Trial) results suggest that valsartan is as effective as captopril in patients following an acute MI with HF and/or LV systolic dysfunction and may be used as an alternative treatment in ACE inhibitor-intolerant patients. There was no survival benefit with valsartan-captopril combination compared with captopril alone in this trial. Despite these results, ACE inhibitors remain the first-choice therapeutic agent in post-MI patients, and ARBs can be used in patients with clear intolerance. Although the use of ACE inhibitors may be appealing in patients with HF and preserved LV systolic function, there is currently no evidence from large clinical trials to support this.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents