Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Erosion Identification in Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis using High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography
Published on: October 6, 2023
Costs in rheumatology: results and lessons learned from the 'Hannover Costing Study'
J L Hülsemann1, J Ruof, H Zeidler
1Division of Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Insights
This study introduces a costing framework for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), revealing that productivity losses often exceed direct medical costs. Patient-reported data effectively captures these RA costs.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses significant economic burdens.
- Accurate cost assessment is crucial for evaluating disease management strategies.
- Existing costing methodologies may lack standardization and comprehensive patient perspectives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the Hannover Costing Study methodology and insights.
- To develop a standardized taxonomy for RA costing studies.
- To analyze patient-reported and payer-derived cost data, including productivity costs.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a randomized controlled trial alongside a comprehensive costing study.
- Developed a matrix of 16 cost domains (outpatient, inpatient, disease-related, productivity).
- Collected and analyzed patient-reported and payer-derived cost data, including productivity loss.
Main Results:
- The developed cost domain matrix provides a common taxonomy for RA costing.
- Total direct RA costs were €2,312 per patient-year; productivity costs exceeded direct costs.
- Patient-reported cost data is reliable for assessing healthcare utilization and productivity losses in RA.
Conclusions:
- The Hannover Costing Study offers valuable insights into RA economic impact.
- A standardized approach to cost data collection is essential for future RA research.
- Understanding productivity costs is critical for a holistic view of RA's economic burden.
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to review the concept of the 'Hannover Costing Study' and to present and discuss the major insights generated during the course of the project. The costing study was performed in conjunction with a randomized controlled prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of a disease management module in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A full set of clinical and cost data both from patient-reported and payer-derived cost data was developed. In particular the study included (1) the development of a matrix of cost domains which might be used as a common taxonomy in costing studies, (2) the descriptive analysis of payer derived cost data, (3) the analysis of cost data in patients with uncertain diagnosis; (4) the development and validation of a patient-reported costing instrument, and (5) an assessment of productivity costs. The following are the results (1) the developed matrix of cost domains included 16 separate cost domains: 7 outpatient, 3 inpatient, 4 other disease related, and 2 productivity domains; (2) the micro-costing analysis showed total direct costs of
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
