Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overloading temporal memory.

Simon Grondin1

  • 1Université Laval.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory significantly impacts temporal processing accuracy. Varying auditory and visual interval cues revealed that memory representations critically influence time perception, suggesting shared memory systems across sensory modalities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution of psychological characteristics to talent identification in ice-hockey.

International journal of sports science & coaching·2026
Same author

Equisection of short empty time intervals marked by successive stimuli of different lengths.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Ontogeny of rhythmic performances and contribution of motor and perceptual rhythmic preferences.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Examining the impact of physiological stress on time perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Development of Lateral Preference in Ice Hockey.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2025
Same author

Studying the Processing of Multimodal Brief Temporal Intervals with an Equisection (Bisection) Task.

Multisensory research·2025
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Temporal processing, the ability to perceive and judge time intervals, is fundamental to cognition.
  • The precise mechanisms underlying temporal judgments, particularly the role of memory, remain incompletely understood.
  • Existing research suggests potential differences in auditory versus visual temporal perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that memory significantly contributes to variance in temporal processing.
  • To examine how the manipulation of memory load, through varying interval durations and marker types, affects temporal categorization accuracy.
  • To explore whether auditory and visual temporal information share common memory representations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a temporal categorization task, distinguishing between short and long intervals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental sessions manipulated the number of base durations and interval marker types (auditory/visual) presented within trial blocks.
  • Performance was assessed by measuring categorization errors under different experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Mixing multiple base durations within trial blocks significantly increased temporal categorization errors.
    • Mixing different marker types (auditory vs. visual) did not significantly affect categorization accuracy.
    • No significant difference was found in the perceived duration of auditory versus visually marked intervals.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the critical role of memory in temporal processing, particularly the involvement of multiple memory representations.
    • The lack of effect from mixing modalities suggests a shared memory representation for auditory and visual temporal information.
    • The absence of modality differences in perceived duration challenges previous findings and warrants further investigation.