Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How much attention does an event file need?

Bernhard Hommel1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Cognitivr psychology Unit, Leiden University, Postbus 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands. hommel@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Altered neural oscillatory dynamics underlie reduced anticipatory schema use during event segmentation in adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

How the influence of cingulate-lingual interactions on event segmentation changes from early to late adolescence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Learning from feedback is independent from feedback visibility, but supported by aperiodic neural activity.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Attribution of Selfhood Based on Simple Behavioral Cues: Toward a Pars-Pro-Toto Account.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that stimulus-response bindings occur even when stimuli are irrelevant or delayed. These bindings impact performance, suggesting perception-action episodes trigger integration.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Previous research indicates that performing a prepared response to a stimulus creates stimulus-response bindings.
  • These bindings can impair performance on subsequent, mismatched stimulus-response combinations.
  • The precise conditions under which spontaneous stimulus-response integration occurs remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the attentional requirements for spontaneous integration of stimulus and response features.
  • To determine if stimulus-response bindings form even when stimuli are not task-relevant or necessary.
  • To investigate the temporal and competitive factors influencing stimulus-response integration.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental analysis of behavioral performance under varying stimulus-response conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation of stimulus relevance, necessity, temporal order, and competition with task-relevant stimuli.
  • Assessment of response suppression effects on stimulus-response integration.

    • Main Results:

    • Spontaneous stimulus-response bindings occur even when stimuli are unnecessary, temporally follow responses, or compete with task-relevant stimuli.
    • Integration is contingent on the stimulus appearing close to the response's execution or abandonment.
    • Response suppression does not prevent integration if the stimulus is temporally proximate.

    Conclusions:

    • Stimulus-response integration can occur spontaneously, without explicit attentional guidance or task necessity.
    • A multiple-integration model is proposed, positing independent local processes for feature integration and perception-action episode-triggered stimulus-response integration.
    • The findings highlight the automaticity of binding processes in perception and action.