Related Experiment Videos
Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill
Susan C Levine1, Marina Vasilyeva, Stella F Lourenco
1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA. s-levine@uchicago.edu
Psychological Science
|November 3, 2005
Summary
The male spatial advantage observed in children is not universal; it is influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Boys from higher SES backgrounds showed an advantage, while no difference was found in lower SES groups.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Prior research often assumes a universal male advantage in spatial skills.
- This advantage is frequently attributed to inherent population-level ability differences between sexes.
- The influence of environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES), on this sex difference is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the male advantage in spatial skills differs across children from varying socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds.
- To challenge the assumption of a uniform male spatial advantage in the general population.
- To explore the implications of SES on sex-related differences in spatial abilities.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal study tracking children across second and third grades.
- Administration of two spatial tasks involving mental transformations.
- Inclusion of a syntax comprehension task to control for verbal abilities.
- Analysis of performance differences based on sex and socioeconomic status (SES).
Main Results:
- Boys from middle- and high-SES groups demonstrated superior performance on spatial tasks compared to girls.
- No significant sex differences in spatial task performance were observed among children from low-SES backgrounds.
- As anticipated, no sex-based differences emerged in the verbal comprehension task.
Conclusions:
- The male spatial advantage is contingent upon socioeconomic status (SES), challenging its universality.
- SES acts as a significant moderator in the development or expression of sex-related differences in spatial skills.
- Future explanations for sex differences in spatial ability must account for socioeconomic and environmental influences.