Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phakic intraocular lenses.

Carlo F Lovisolo1, Dan Z Reinstein

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, San Raffaele Hospital and QuattroElle Eye Center, Milan, Italy, and Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas Hospital-Kings College, London, UK. loviseye@fastwebnet.it

Survey of Ophthalmology
|November 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heterogeneous Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thicknesses in Patients With Very Asymmetric Ectasia: A Case Series.

Eye & contact lens·2026
Same author

Assessing the Visual and Refractive Outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision Treatment in Myopic and Hyperopic Presbyopic Patients in Western Australia.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Comment on Epithelial Mapping Efficacy for Subclinical Keratoconus Identification.

American journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Reply.

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2025
Same author

Clinical Management of Vision Degrading Myodesopsia from Vitreous Floaters: Observation vs. Limited Refractive Vitrectomy.

Ophthalmology. Retina·2025
Same author

"Dose" in Femtosecond Lasers: A Matter of Context and Clarity.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2025
Same journal

Trends in pediatric uveitis: A systematic review and meta-epidemiological investigation of geographic, economic, and climate factors.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of different intraocular therapies for non-infectious uveitis: A network meta-analysis.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Macular telangiectasia masqueraders.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Utilization of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in childhood glaucoma: A systematic review.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome: Clinical and imaging features, diagnostic differentiation and therapeutic strategies.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic factors and postoperative outcomes in pediatric cataract patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Phakic intraocular lenses show promise for correcting refractive errors. Custom-design and sizing are crucial for safety and long-term compatibility of these internal lenses.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs) are gaining traction for refractive error correction.
  • Addressing limitations of excimer laser refractive surgery is a key driver for PIOL development.
  • Ensuring long-term ocular health and device compatibility is paramount.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct an analytical review of existing phakic intraocular lens data.
  • To critically assess intraocular lens sizing, safety guidelines, and implantation techniques.
  • To evaluate commercial claims related to phakic intraocular lens technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive competitive analysis of implantation sites, PIOL designs, and safety protocols.
  • Review of specialized biometry techniques, including very high frequency ultrasound and Scheimpflug imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical evaluation of clinical studies and commercial data.
  • Main Results:

    • Phakic intraocular lenses show significant promise for refractive error correction.
    • Custom-design and sizing, potentially guided by VHF ultrasound, appear most effective and safest.
    • Long-term physiological inertness and anatomical compatibility are essential considerations for PIOLs.

    Conclusions:

    • Phakic intraocular lenses offer a viable alternative for specific refractive error cases.
    • Continued critical evaluation of long-term outcomes using advanced imaging is essential.
    • Ensuring safe explantation or exchange options is important for patient safety over time.