Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance.

Todd Pawlicki1, Matthew Whitaker, Arthur L Boyer

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. tpaw@stanford.edu

Medical Physics
|November 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same author

High aspect-ratio quadrilateral flexible silica optical fibers for enhanced multi-parameter sensing.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Profiling vaccine attitudes and subsequent uptake in 1·1 million people in England: a nationwide cohort study.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Pandemic risk-related behaviour change in England from June 2020 to March 2022: the cross-sectional REACT-1 study among over 2 million people.

BMJ public health·2025
Same author

A streamlined workflow for comprehensive 4DCT imaging QA with automated analysis of spatial integrity and image quality.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2025
Same author

How COVID-19 affected academic publishing: a 3-year study of 17 million research papers.

International journal of epidemiology·2025

Statistical process control and process behavior charts effectively differentiate random and systematic errors in radiotherapy quality assurance. This method improves error detection and process management for medical physicists.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
  • Statistical Process Control

Background:

  • Quality assurance (QA) in radiotherapy identifies both random and systematic errors.
  • Current QA practices often fail to distinguish between these error types, hindering efficient error correction.
  • Distinguishing error sources is crucial for targeted improvements in radiotherapy delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply statistical process control (SPC) to radiotherapy QA.
  • To develop and implement process behavior charts (PBCs) for differentiating random and systematic errors.
  • To establish action thresholds that effectively signal process deviations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized statistical process control principles for radiotherapy QA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed and implemented process behavior charts (PBCs).
  • Applied PBCs to daily output and flatness/symmetry QA for a 10 MV photon beam over 52 days.

    • Main Results:

    • PBC-derived action thresholds successfully identified systematic changes in the QA process.
    • Standard deviation methods failed to detect the same systematic changes.
    • PBCs detected a 2% process change, while standard deviation methods did not.

    Conclusions:

    • Process behavior charts provide a superior method for detecting systematic errors in radiotherapy QA compared to standard deviation.
    • PBCs aid medical physicists in making timely decisions regarding QA data and process adjustments.
    • Implementing PBCs enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of radiotherapy quality assurance programs.