Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Virtual colonoscopy is now reality].

Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen1, Michael P Achiam, Regnar Bøge Arnesen

  • 1Arhus Universitetshospital, Arhus Sygehus, Radiologisk. ginnerup-kelsen@dadlnet.dk

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|November 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

STHLM3 NorDCaP: prospective multicentre trial of Stockholm3 for active surveillance biopsy guidance.

BJU international·2026
Same author

The IPA-CUP study: Indocyanine green perfusion assessment and cholangiography during pancreaticoduodenectomy-Evaluation of the pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy.

Surgery·2026
Same author

The impact of tissue detection on diagnostic artificial intelligence algorithms in prostate digital pathology.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Emergency parastomal hernia repair - a systematic review.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2025
Same author

Preoperative marking of the proximal resection margin in esophageal cancer with a surgical fiducial marker: First experiences.

World journal of methodology·2025
Same author

Development and retrospective validation of an artificial intelligence system for diagnostic assessment of prostate biopsies: study protocol.

BMJ open·2025

Virtual colonoscopy using CT scans shows promise for detecting colorectal polyps and cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional colonoscopy. However, clinical use requires caution due to variability in interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Virtual colonoscopy utilizes helical CT or MR scans for colorectal polyp and cancer detection.
  • It demonstrates comparable sensitivity to colonoscopy for larger polyps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of virtual colonoscopy.
  • To compare virtual colonoscopy with traditional colonoscopy and barium enema.

Main Methods:

  • Helical CT or MR scans of the abdomen and pelvis were employed.
  • Sensitivity for polyp detection was compared between modalities.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted based on a Danish study.

Main Results:

  • Both CT and MR virtual colonoscopy show promising sensitivity for larger polyps.

Related Experiment Videos

  • CT colonography (CTC) is cost-effective compared to colonoscopy.
  • CTC is recommended over barium enema for incomplete colonoscopies.

    • Conclusions:

    • Virtual colonoscopy is a viable tool for colorectal cancer screening.
    • Clinical implementation necessitates addressing interobserver variability and learning curves.
    • CTC presents a cost-effective and recommended alternative in specific clinical scenarios.