Structure, thermodynamics, and liquid-vapor equilibrium of ethanol from molecular-dynamics simulations using...

We present a molecular-dynamics simulation study of the bulk and liquid-vapor interfacial properties of ethanol using a polarizable force field based on the fluctuating charge (FQ) formalism, as well as the nonpolarizable CHARMM22 force field. Both models are competitive with respect to the prediction of ambient liquid properties such as liquid density, enthalpy of vaporization, dielectric constant, and self-diffusion constants. The polarizable model predicts an average condensed-phase dipole moment of 2.2 D associated with an induced liquid-phase dipole moment of 0.6 D; though qualitatively in agreement with earlier nonadditive models as well as recent Car-Parinello calculations, the current FQ model underestimates the condensed-phase dipole moment. In terms of liquid structure, both models are in agreement with recent neutron-diffraction results of liquid ethanol structure, although the polarizable model predicts the hydroxyl-hydrogen-hydroxyl-hydrogen structure factor in closer agreement with the experimental data. In terms of interfacial properties, both models predict ambient surface tension to within 4% of the experimental value of 22.8 dyncm, while overestimating the surface excess entropy by almost a factor of 2. Both models display the characteristic preferential orientation of interfacial molecules. The polarizable model allows for a monotonic variation of the average molecular dipole moment from the bulk value to that of the vapor phase. Consequently, there is a dramatic difference in the surface potential predicted by the polarizable and nonpolarizable models. The polarizable model estimates a surface potential of -209+/-3 mV, while the nonpolarizable model yields a value of -944+/-10 mV. Finally, based on the vapor-liquid equilibrium simulation data from several temperatures, we estimate the critical properties of both models. As observed with other FQ models for associating fluids (such as water and methanol), and counter to what one would anticipate by modeling more physically the electrostatic response to local environment, the current FQ model underestimates the critical temperature and overestimates the critical density of ethanol; moreover, the FQ model is, in this respect, equivalent to the underlying fixed-charge model. These results further suggest the need to revisit polarizable models in terms of quantitative vapor-liquid equilibrium prediction.