Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments.

James R Lackner1, Paul DiZio

  • 1Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, Massachusetts, 02454-9110, USA. agsol@brandeis.edu

Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|November 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Impact of vestibular dysfunction studies on space flight health challenges.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Postural stability during illusory self-motion-interactions of vision and touch.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

The effect of vibrotactile feedback on performance, perception and trust when balancing in different analog g-levels.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Potential benefits and human systems integration of parastronauts with bilateral vestibulopathy for a space mission.

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Vestibular system: A revolution in understanding a neglected sensory system.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

In a visual inverted pendulum balancing task avoiding impending falls gets harder as we age.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

Cichlid fish as a model for understanding social dysfunction.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

On aims and methods in field neuroethology: Investigating neural mechanisms of behavior in semi-natural and natural contexts.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Neurobiological interfaces connecting environmental change to monarch butterfly migration.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Learning how to experience the world: From circuits to cell types to genes.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Editorial overview for neurobiology of disease 2026.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Optical voltage imaging: ready to spark systems neuroscience.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
See all related articles

Motor adaptation differs based on whether the body self-calibrates or learns an external tool. Rapid adaptation occurs for self-generated Coriolis forces, while slower adaptation is seen for robotic perturbations, highlighting distinct motor learning mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Dynamic perturbations are crucial for understanding motor learning and adaptation.
  • Coriolis forces during arm movements and robotic perturbations present distinct challenges to motor control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differences in adaptation to self-generated Coriolis forces versus externally applied robotic forces.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of motor adaptation, distinguishing between self-calibration and learning external object dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Comparing the speed and perception of adaptation to velocity-dependent Coriolis forces during passive body rotation versus forces from a robotic manipulandum.
  • Analyzing the role of anticipatory feedforward motor compensations in everyday movements experiencing Coriolis forces.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Adaptation to self-generated Coriolis forces is rapid and leads to the forces no longer being sensed.
  • Adaptation to robotic perturbations is slower, and the forces remain perceived even after adaptation.
  • Everyday Coriolis forces are compensated by feedforward mechanisms, maintaining movement accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The distinct adaptation patterns suggest a difference between motor control self-calibration and learning external tool dynamics.
  • Understanding these differences provides insight into the flexibility and specificity of the human motor system.
  • Further research can explore the neural underpinnings of these distinct adaptive processes.