Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Subcloning Plus Insertion (SPI) - A Novel Recombineering Method for the Rapid Construction of Gene Targeting Vectors
Published on: January 8, 2015
Redefining the common insertion site
Xiaolin Wu1, Brian T Luke, Shawn M Burgess
1Laboratory of Molecular Technology, Scientific Application International Corporation-Frederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, NIH, Frederick, MD, USA.
Abstract:
Retroviral mutagenesis has been used as a powerful tool to discover genes involved in oncogenesis through a technique called Common Insertion Site (CIS) analysis where tumors are induced by proviral integrations and the genomic loci of the proviruses are identified. A fundamental assumption made in this analysis is that multiple proviral insertions in close proximity occurring more frequently than would be predicted randomly provides evidence that the genes near the integrations are involved in the formation of the tumors. We demonstrate here using data derived from MLV integrations not put under selection for tumor induction that CIS analysis as currently defined is often not a sufficient argument for a gene's significance in tumorigenesis.
Insights
Common Insertion Site analysis, used to find cancer genes, may not be reliable. Retroviral insertions not under selection show that proximity doesn't always indicate a gene's role in tumor formation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Retroviral mutagenesis is a key method for identifying genes in oncogenesis.
- Common Insertion Site (CIS) analysis relies on proviral integration patterns near genes.
- A core assumption is that non-randomly frequent insertions indicate involvement in tumor development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of Common Insertion Site (CIS) analysis in identifying genes critical for tumorigenesis.
- To determine if proviral insertion proximity reliably predicts a gene's role in cancer development.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV) integrations.
- Analyzed integration patterns without selection pressure for tumor induction.
- Assessed the statistical significance of insertion clustering.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that CIS analysis, as currently defined, is frequently insufficient to establish a gene's significance in tumorigenesis.
- Observed that MLV integrations not under selection do not always cluster near genes causally linked to cancer.
- Highlighted potential flaws in the fundamental assumption of CIS analysis.
Conclusions:
- The assumption that frequent, proximate proviral insertions indicate oncogenic gene involvement requires re-evaluation.
- CIS analysis alone may not be a sufficient criterion for implicating genes in cancer formation.
- Further validation is needed for genes identified through CIS analysis, especially when selection is not a factor.
Related Concept Videos
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon has three reading...
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
Overview of Transposition and Recombination
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...

