Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Redefining the common insertion site.

Xiaolin Wu1, Brian T Luke, Shawn M Burgess

  • 1Laboratory of Molecular Technology, Scientific Application International Corporation-Frederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, NIH, Frederick, MD, USA.

Virology
|November 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete <i>de novo</i> assembly and re-annotation of the zebrafish genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Elucidating the Mechanism by Which HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Mutations Confer Resistance to Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

HIV-1 control in vivo is related to the number but not the fraction of infected cells with viral unspliced RNA.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Elucidating the mechanism by which HIV-1 nucleocapsid mutations confer resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors.

Science advances·2025
Same author

CRISPR-based functional genomics tools in vertebrate models.

Experimental & molecular medicine·2025
Same author

Differential HIV-1 Proviral Defects in Children vs. Adults on Antiretroviral Therapy.

Viruses·2025

Common Insertion Site analysis, used to find cancer genes, may not be reliable. Retroviral insertions not under selection show that proximity doesn't always indicate a gene's role in tumor formation.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Retroviral mutagenesis is a key method for identifying genes in oncogenesis.
  • Common Insertion Site (CIS) analysis relies on proviral integration patterns near genes.
  • A core assumption is that non-randomly frequent insertions indicate involvement in tumor development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of Common Insertion Site (CIS) analysis in identifying genes critical for tumorigenesis.
  • To determine if proviral insertion proximity reliably predicts a gene's role in cancer development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV) integrations.
  • Analyzed integration patterns without selection pressure for tumor induction.
  • Assessed the statistical significance of insertion clustering.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that CIS analysis, as currently defined, is frequently insufficient to establish a gene's significance in tumorigenesis.
  • Observed that MLV integrations not under selection do not always cluster near genes causally linked to cancer.
  • Highlighted potential flaws in the fundamental assumption of CIS analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption that frequent, proximate proviral insertions indicate oncogenic gene involvement requires re-evaluation.
  • CIS analysis alone may not be a sufficient criterion for implicating genes in cancer formation.
  • Further validation is needed for genes identified through CIS analysis, especially when selection is not a factor.