Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
Published on: February 16, 2022
Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis
Anton Gros1, Jagoda Vatovec, Miha Zargi
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia. anton.gros@guest.arnes.si
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing results of revision stapes surgery performed because of previously failed operations and to determine the causes of failure.
Study Design:
Retrospective review of revision stapes operations.
Setting:
Tertiary referral center.
Patients:
Sixty-three consecutive revision stapes operations were performed in 56 patients over a period of 12 years (1992-2004). The indication for revision surgery was recurrent or persistent air-bone gap greater than 20 dB after primary surgical treatment of otosclerosis of the oval window.
Results:
All patients were operated on to improve hearing. Sixty-three revision stapes operations resulted in closure of the air-bone gap to 10 dB or less in 52.4% of cases. The average postoperative air-bone gap was 13.1 dB, and the mean pure-tone average improvement was 12.9 dB. In six patients (9.5%), revision surgery produced no change in hearing, and in four (6.3%) the hearing decreased by 5 dB or more. In one patient, the operation resulted in a profound hearing loss. Prosthesis malfunction was the most common primary cause of failure (60.3%). The original prosthesis was replaced with a new one in 48 cases. In 30 of these (62.5%), closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved. In 15 cases, the prosthesis was not replaced, and in only four of these (26.7%), closure of the air-bone gap within 10 dB was obtained (p < 0.022).
Conclusion:
Revision stapes surgery is less likely to be successful than the primary operation. Closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved in 52.4% of patients. The success rate was better in cases where the original prosthesis was replaced with a new one. The risk for decreased bone-conduction threshold does not seem to be higher than in primary surgery.
