Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy -- dilemmas and difficulties
Andrzej Przybylski1, Longina Małecka, Mariusz Pytkowski
12nd Coronary Department, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. aprzybylski@ikard.pl
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy effectively prevents sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. However, complications, particularly inappropriate shocks due to T-wave oversensing, are common and require careful device programming.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD).
- Their use in primary prevention for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients remains debated due to implantation risks and patient selection challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency and types of complications following ICD implantation in HCM patients.
- To assess long-term safety and efficacy of ICDs in both primary and secondary SCD prevention.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 46 HCM patients received ICDs for primary (n=28) or secondary (n=18) SCD prevention.
- Follow-up data were analyzed to determine appropriate/inappropriate ICD interventions and complication rates.
Main Results:
- Appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 55% of secondary and 10% of primary prevention groups.
- Complications affected 33% of patients, with inappropriate shocks (30%) being most frequent, often due to T-wave oversensing.
- Infections and lead displacement were less common; no significant differences in complications were noted between primary and secondary prevention groups.
Conclusions:
- ICD therapy demonstrates high efficacy in SCD prevention for HCM patients.
- High rates of complications, especially inappropriate shocks, necessitate meticulous device programming and T-wave oversensing prevention strategies.
Introduction:
The implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is an established method of sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention. The value of ICD therapy in secondary prevention of SCD is unquestionable. Precise identification of high-risk patients and ICD use for primary prevention of SCD, especially in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), remain controversial. Problems include the high prevalence of complications associated with ICD implantation and optimal selection of ICDs.
Aim:
To estimate the frequency and type of complications after ICD implantations in HCM patients in a long-term follow-up.
Method:
The efficacy and safety of ICD therapy were estimated in 46 HCM patients with devices implanted for a secondary (n-18) or primary prevention (n-28) of SCD.
Results:
During the mean follow-up period of 28.2+/-26.1 months (from 2 to 68) appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 10 (55%) patients of the secondary prevention group and in 3 (10%) patients of the primary prevention group. Complications were documented in 15 (33%) patients. The most frequent were inappropriate ICD interventions recorded in 14 (30%) patients. The causes of these inappropriate ICD shocks were: T-wave oversensing (7 patients), atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rhythm (3 patients), lead failure (2 patients), and sinus tachycardia (2 patients). In two patients infections of the ICD pocket requiring removal of the system occurred. Displacement of the lead occurred in one patient. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of complications between the primary and secondary prevention groups or in the number of inappropriate interventions with respect to ICD type.
Conclusions:
The high rate of appropriate ICD shocks provides proof of high ICD-based SCD prevention efficacy. There is a high rate of complications observed after ICD implantation with inappropriate interventions being the most frequent among them. This indicates that careful programming of the device as well as the use of a programme with T-wave oversensing prevention should be ensured.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
