Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials.

Lawrence H Moulton1

  • 1Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 20912, USA. lmoulton@jhsph.edu

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|November 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acceptability and safety of one versus three months of rifapentine and isoniazid to prevent tuberculosis in people exposed in the household or workplace in Brazil: The Ultra-Curto randomized controlled trial.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Experiences of participants in ETEC controlled human infection model studies.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Protocol for NAC Attack, a phase-3, multicenter randomized, parallel, double masked, placebo controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Adopting the estimand framework in prophylactic vaccine trials.

Vaccine·2025
Same author

Liquefied Petroleum Gas or Biomass for Cooking and Effects on Blood Pressure: Results from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Trial.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

RSV Prefusion F Vaccine for Prevention of Hospitalization in Older Adults.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Morning panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Group-randomized trials can achieve better covariate balance using a constrained randomization procedure. This method enhances study design but requires careful implementation to maintain impartiality and statistical validity.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Group-randomized trials (GRTs) are essential when individual randomization is infeasible or insufficient for parameter estimation.
  • Traditional blocked or stratified designs are statistically evaluated, but GRTs often face challenges like small experimental units and strong between-unit correlation, increasing randomization risks.
  • These challenges can lead to suboptimal randomization outcomes, impacting study validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel procedure for allocating treatment conditions in group-randomized trials.
  • To ensure balance on relevant covariates, including both individual- and group-level factors.
  • To provide a method that improves upon existing randomization techniques for complex trial designs.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a procedure involving random selection from a list of acceptable allocations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This method allows for balancing numerous individual- and group-level covariates using exact or caliper criteria.
  • The procedure aims to enhance the statistical properties of group-randomized study designs.

    • Main Results:

    • Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method possesses good frequency properties for randomization.
    • The procedure effectively balances relevant covariates, improving the quality of group-randomized trials.
    • However, overly constraining the randomization may impact investigator impartiality and Type I error rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The described procedure offers a valuable tool for improving covariate balance in group-randomized trials.
    • Careful application is necessary to balance the benefits of enhanced design with the need for perceived and actual impartiality.
    • Further consideration is needed regarding the trade-offs between design constraints and potential impacts on study integrity.