Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
Published on: July 8, 2025
Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review
J C Thomas1, R T DeMarco, J M Donohoe
1Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Insights
Open dismembered pyeloplasty is highly successful in children, but failures can occur late. Management of failed pyeloplasty often requires open surgery for optimal salvage rates.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Renal Pelvic Surgery
Background:
- Pyeloplasty is a common surgical procedure for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
- Open dismembered pyeloplasty has a high success rate, but understanding failure patterns is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty.
- To analyze the presentation and management of failed pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing open dismembered pyeloplasty (1998-2003).
- Exclusion of patients with less than 6 months follow-up.
- Postoperative monitoring with serial ultrasounds and renograms for specific indications.
Main Results:
- Overall success rate of 93.3% in 105 pyeloplasties.
- Seven patients experienced treatment failure, presenting with pain and worsening hydronephrosis.
- Open surgery achieved a 100% salvage rate for failed pyeloplasties, with causes including scarring and crossing vessels.
Conclusions:
- Open dismembered pyeloplasty is generally successful, but late failures can occur.
- Technical issues, such as missed crossing vessels, are likely causes of failure.
- Open surgery is the preferred management for failed pyeloplasty, offering high salvage rates.
Purpose:
We reviewed our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty, with specific focus on the presentation and management of failed pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
Materials And Methods:
We performed a retrospective review of patients who had undergone open dismembered pyeloplasty between 1998 and 2003. All patients with less than 6 months of followup were excluded from analysis. The patients were followed postoperatively with serial ultrasounds, with renograms reserved for those patients with prolonged, persistent or worsening hydronephrosis, or recurrent symptoms during followup.
Results:
A total of 105 pyeloplasties were performed in 103 patients (71 males and 32 females) 1 to 204 months old (mean 60), with an overall success rate of 93.3%. Followup ranged from 6 to 69 months (mean 23). The 7 patients with treatment failure were males 1 to 204 months old (mean 125), who presented most commonly with pain within 3 to 38 months (mean 13.1) after initial surgery. Subsequent ultrasound revealed worsening hydronephrosis, and renography in these patients showed a pattern consistent with obstruction. Five patients underwent initial balloon dilation, in which 1 was successful. In addition, 1 of these patients underwent an unsuccessful antegrade laser endopyelotomy. Six patients (86%) underwent open surgery, consisting of ureterocalicostomy in 3 and reoperative dismembered pyeloplasty in 3. Dense scarring was seen in all patients, 2 patients had a redundant pelvis causing kinking and 2 patients had unrecognized crossing vessels. Overall salvage rate was 100% with continued followup of 3 to 50 months (mean 18).
Conclusions:
Dismembered pyeloplasty was successful in the vast majority of patients. In our series failures occurred as late as 3 years postoperatively, although most presented within 12 months of followup. Excluding routine postoperative nuclear renography did not seem to affect our ability to identify these cases. Although anatomical features such as renal pelvic size may have a role, failure is most likely secondary to technical issues, including missed crossing vessels and dependency of the anastomosis. In this series failed pyeloplasties did not respond well to balloon dilation, likely due to scar formation. Our current practice is to manage failures by open surgery, although endoscopic management by an incision may be an option.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management