Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations.

Philip W Lavori1, Ree Dawson

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System (151 K), 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. Philip.Lavori@med.va.gov

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|November 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive cognitive control circuit changes associated with problem-solving ability and depression symptom outcomes over 24 months.

Science translational medicine·2024
Same author

Mediating Effects of Neural Targets on Depression, Weight, and Anxiety Outcomes of an Integrated Collaborative Care Intervention: The ENGAGE-2 Mechanistic Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2023
Same author

Problem-solving therapy-induced amygdala engagement mediates lifestyle behavior change in obesity with comorbid depression: a randomized proof-of-mechanism trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2021
Same author

Early changes in neural circuit function engaged by negative emotion and modified by behavioural intervention are associated with depression and problem-solving outcomes: A report from the ENGAGE randomized controlled trial.

EBioMedicine·2021
Same author

Correction: Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial.

PloS one·2020
Same author

The ENGAGE-2 study: Engaging self-regulation targets to understand the mechanisms of behavior change and improve mood and weight outcomes in a randomized controlled trial (Phase 2).

Contemporary clinical trials·2020

Randomized experiments can reliably compare dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) for chronic diseases. This approach avoids untestable assumptions required in observational studies, ensuring accurate treatment effect estimation for personalized medicine.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Chronic disease management necessitates dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) that adapt based on patient response.
  • Estimating DTR effectiveness often relies on the untestable assumption of sequential ignorability in observational studies.
  • Randomization of DTRs can guarantee sequential ignorability, providing a more robust estimation framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and illustrate simple randomized experimental designs for comparing DTRs.
  • To explore methods for optimizing treatment sequences within DTRs.
  • To contrast experimental and observational approaches to DTR comparison and optimization.

Main Methods:

  • Description of randomized experimental designs for comparing DTRs, including simple two-treatment scenarios (A then B).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustration of comparing DTRs to fixed treatment strategies (A or B).
  • Explanation of two randomization methods: baseline randomization and sequential randomization at decision points.

    • Main Results:

    • Randomized designs provide a framework for comparing dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) against fixed treatments.
    • Both baseline and sequentially randomized designs allow for estimation and inference on DTR effects.
    • Experimental approaches offer advantages over observational methods for optimizing and comparing DTRs.

    Conclusions:

    • Randomized experimental designs are crucial for reliable comparison of dynamic treatment regimes.
    • Sequential ignorability is achievable through randomization, overcoming limitations of observational studies.
    • Understanding the differences between experimental and observational approaches is key for advancing personalized medicine.