Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Real-World M3-BREATHE: Toward Multimodal Mobile Monitoring of Behaviour, Respiration, and Exposures for Treatment and Health Evaluation
Published on: June 5, 2026
Geographic bias related to geocoding in epidemiologic studies
M Norman Oliver1, Kevin A Matthews, Mir Siadaty
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. mno3p@virginia.edu
Geographic bias in spatial analysis can occur due to missing geocodes. This study found that missing data in Virginia prostate cancer cases were concentrated in rural areas, impacting cluster mapping and leading to "cartographic confounding."
Area of Science:
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
- Spatial Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analyses can be subject to geographic bias when using incomplete or unrepresentative data.
- Missing geocodes in health data, such as prostate cancer incidence, can lead to skewed spatial analyses.
- This study examines geographic bias in a spatial analysis of prostate cancer incidence in Virginia (1990-1999).
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and quantify geographic bias in GIS analyses stemming from missing geocodes.
- To investigate the spatial patterns of missing geocodes in prostate cancer cases in Virginia.
- To identify factors associated with missing geocodes in health data.
Main Methods:
- Spatial analysis of prostate cancer incidence among white and African American populations in Virginia.
- Statistical tests for spatial clustering and mapping of identified clusters.
- Generalized linear regression models to examine patterns of missing census tract identifiers.
Main Results:
- Of 26,338 prostate cancer cases, 74% were successfully geocoded to census tracts.
- Cluster maps displayed markedly different patterns based on the inclusion of all cases versus only geocoded cases.
- Multivariate regression revealed that higher percentages of elderly populations (over 64) and individuals with less than a high school education in rural counties were independently associated with a higher percentage of missing geocodes.
Conclusions:
- Statistically significant differences in spatial patterns were observed due to non-random variations in geocoding completeness across Virginia.
- The phenomenon of "cartographic confounding" arises from spatially non-random differences in data completeness.
- Accurate interpretation of spatial maps derived from health data necessitates understanding and accounting for potential "cartographic confounding."
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Causality in Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
