Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Velopharyngeal dysfunction: evolving developments in evaluation.

Mark R Rowe1, Linda L D'Antonio

  • 1Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University and Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
|November 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pediatric Laryngeal Coccidioidomycosis: A Case Series in an Endemic Region.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2023
Same author

Disk battery aspiration in a young child: a scarcely reported phenomenon.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2012
Same author

Early intervention for speech impairment in children with cleft palate.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2008
Same author

Pediatric melanoma of the head and neck: a single institutions experience.

The Laryngoscope·2006
Same author

Use of a consensus building approach to plan speech services for children with cleft palate in India.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2003
Same journal

Advances in patient-specific 3D-printed models in temporal bone surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Graduated autonomy in head and neck microvascular surgery fellowship training: oncologic and reconstructive competency, safety, and educational implications.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Costs and system-wide considerations within head and neck reconstruction: moving toward a value-based care framework.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Modern methods of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Flap selection for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Improving facial scar outcomes: an evidence-based update.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating velopharyngeal function involves multiple methods like nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy. The best approach depends on clinical goals, balancing benefits and risks for speech disorder diagnosis and treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Velopharyngeal valving disorders impact speech and require accurate diagnosis.
  • Otolaryngologists play a key role in evaluating these disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current methods for assessing velopharyngeal function.
  • To inform differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Direct visualization techniques including nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for anatomical and functional evaluation.
  • Instrumental assessments for surgical planning and outcome prediction.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy are the most common direct visualization methods.
  • MRI offers valuable insights but faces practical limitations (cost, routine use).
  • Nasendoscopy is likely to remain prevalent due to cost and radiation concerns.

    • Conclusions:

    • No single method is universally best for evaluating velopharyngeal function.
    • The choice of evaluation protocol should align with specific clinical information needs.
    • These methods are increasingly utilized by otolaryngologists for diagnosis and treatment guidance.