Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bladder neck pubovaginal slings.

Alexander Gomelsky1, Roger R Dmochowski

  • 1Department of Urology-Shreveport, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, PO Box 33932, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA. agomel@lsuhsc.edu

Expert Review of Medical Devices
|November 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Urobiome Analysis in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Reveals Nuanced Differences Associated with Localized Pain.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same author

Treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder with incobotulinumtoxinA and vibe delivery system (XAVIER): pilot study.

Minerva urology and nephrology·2026
Same author

Cost-utility of implantable tibial neuromodulation (Revi) versus conservative therapy for urgency urinary incontinence in adults: a US payer perspective.

Journal of medical economics·2026
Same author

Three-Year Efficacy and Safety of Revi Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation from the Pivotal OASIS Study.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Impact of Revi® Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation on Quality of Life in Patients with Urgency Urinary Incontinence.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same author

Health outcomes and costs in patients prescribed anticholinergic medications for overactive bladder.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2025

The pubovaginal sling is now the leading surgery for stress urinary incontinence, offering faster recovery. This review compares new materials for biocompatibility and effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • The pubovaginal sling procedure has become the predominant surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence over the last three decades.
  • Technological advancements have improved surgical efficiency and patient recovery times, contributing to its increased popularity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the biocompatibility and efficacy of various pubovaginal sling materials.
  • To review the unique complications associated with novel allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on pubovaginal sling procedures.
  • Comparative analysis of different sling materials based on biocompatibility and efficacy data.
  • Examination of complication profiles associated with various graft types.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Pubovaginal slings are now more common than retropubic and transvaginal suspensions for stress urinary incontinence.
  • Novel materials (allografts, xenografts, synthetics) present different complication profiles compared to traditional autologous materials.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of sling material significantly impacts patient outcomes and potential complications.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term biocompatibility and efficacy of newer pubovaginal sling materials.