Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In defense of paternalism.

Erich H Loewy1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, USA. ehloewy@ucdavis.edu

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|November 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Framing issues in health care: do American ideals demand basic health care and other social necessities for all?

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2007
Same author

Readers' responses and authors' replies to "healthcare and the hospital chaplain".

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Oaths for physicians--necessary protection or elaborate hoax?

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Healthcare systems and motivation.

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Healthcare and the hospital chaplain.

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007

Physicians should guide patients in setting feasible health goals, rather than overwhelming them with choices. True patient autonomy respects their right to choose goals and even the decision not to choose.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • The principle of patient autonomy is often interpreted as a physician's obligation to present all treatment options.
  • This interpretation can inadvertently shift the burden of decision-making onto patients, potentially undermining their well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the prevailing emphasis on stark patient autonomy in medical decision-making.
  • To reassert the physician's fundamental duty to actively guide patients toward their specific good.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis of clinical decision-making models.
  • Review of established principles in medical ethics regarding patient rights and physician duties.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Analytical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • An overemphasis on patient autonomy can lead physicians to abdicate their core responsibility of pursuing the patient's best interest.
  • Physicians should actively collaborate with patients to define achievable goals and discuss treatment options.

Conclusions:

  • Respecting patient autonomy involves more than presenting options; it requires shared decision-making and goal setting.
  • Physicians must lead the process of goal selection, ensuring patient choices align with feasible and beneficial outcomes.