Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Average Acceleration01:30

Average Acceleration

The importance of understanding acceleration spans our day-to-day experiences, as well as the vast reaches of outer space and the tiny world of subatomic physics. In everyday conversation, to accelerate means to speed up. For instance, we are familiar with the acceleration of our car; the harder we apply our foot to the gas pedal, the faster we accelerate. The greater the acceleration, the greater the change in velocity over a given time. Acceleration is widely seen in experimental physics. In...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...
Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity01:12

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity

Consider a coffee mug hanging on a hook in a pantry. If the mug gets knocked, it oscillates back and forth like a pendulum until the oscillations die out.
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-Intensity Physical Activity During Late Adolescence Predicts Young Adult CT-Based Finite Element Bone Strength in Emerging Adulthood: Iowa Bone Development Study.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Reference Standards for Vertical Jump Power and Handgrip Strength for Screening the Risk of Low Bone and Muscle Mass for Age in Youth.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2025
Same author

Associations Between Youth Sport Participation and Bone, Muscle, and Fat in Adulthood: Iowa Bone Development Study.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025
Same author

New Protocol for Submaximal and Peak Exercise Values for Children and Adolescents: The Muscatine Study.

Pediatric exercise science·2024
Same author

Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (PPAQ-SF).

American journal of epidemiology·2024
Same author

Update and Novel Validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

American journal of epidemiology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 22, 2026

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

Calibration of accelerometer output for children.

Patty Freedson1, David Pober, Kathleen F Janz

  • 1Department of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. psf@excsci.umass.edu

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|November 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Objective accelerometers are crucial for measuring children's physical activity, but calibration methods vary significantly. This review highlights inconsistencies in accelerometer cut-points, recommending raw data analysis for accurate activity intensity assessment in youth.

More Related Videos

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

Developing a Behavioral Box for Assessing Prepulse Inhibition and Neural Activity in Psychiatric Animal Models
06:55

Developing a Behavioral Box for Assessing Prepulse Inhibition and Neural Activity in Psychiatric Animal Models

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 22, 2026

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

Developing a Behavioral Box for Assessing Prepulse Inhibition and Neural Activity in Psychiatric Animal Models
06:55

Developing a Behavioral Box for Assessing Prepulse Inhibition and Neural Activity in Psychiatric Animal Models

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Exercise Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Kinesiology

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of physical activity in children and youth is vital for designing effective interventions.
  • Objective methods like accelerometers are preferred over self-report due to recall bias in younger populations.
  • Existing calibration methods for accelerometers in children show considerable variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the calibration of commonly used accelerometers (ActiGraph, Actical, Actiwatch, RT3) in children and youth.
  • To examine regression modeling approaches for calibrating accelerometers against measured energy expenditure.
  • To present findings on energy expenditure estimates and activity intensity cut-points across studies.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of studies calibrating accelerometers using direct energy expenditure measurements.
  • Analysis of regression modeling techniques employed in accelerometer calibration.
  • Compilation of energy expenditure point estimates and count ranges for different activity intensities.

Main Results:

  • Significant variation exists in accelerometer count cut-points defining activity intensities (e.g., 3 and 6 METs) across studies.
  • Inconsistencies persist despite similar testing protocols including walking, running, and free-living activities.
  • Calibration approaches differ, impacting the comparability of physical activity and sedentary behavior data.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized best practices for accelerometer calibration in pediatric populations are needed.
  • Alternative data processing using raw acceleration signals may offer a more robust method for activity characterization.
  • Further research should focus on refining calibration techniques to improve the accuracy and reliability of objective physical activity measures in children.