Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods.

Richard H Wilson1, Christopher A Burks, Deborah G Weakley

  • 1James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN 37684, USA. RICHARD.WILSON2@MED.VA.GOV

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|November 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study found no significant difference between two methods for measuring speech understanding in noise. Listener perception did not correlate with measured speech-in-noise ability.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MAPK-driven epithelial cell plasticity drives colorectal cancer therapeutic resistance.

Nature·2025
Same author

Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimates among patients with cancer.

British journal of cancer·2025
Same author

A Preliminary Report on an Adaptive Word-Recognition Protocol That Generates Word-Recognition Functions.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2025
Same author

Predicted and measured word-recognition scores unmask distortion in the impaired auditory system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

A Phase Ia/b study of MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with RAS mutant advanced colorectal cancer (MErCuRIC).

BMC cancer·2025
Same author

A phase Ia study of the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901 with the c-MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced solid cancers.

BJC reports·2025

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech Perception Research
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Assessing speech understanding in noise is crucial for hearing loss management.
  • Standardized tests are needed to evaluate auditory rehabilitation effectiveness.
  • Understanding the relationship between different testing protocols and real-world perception is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of descending versus random presentation level protocols in assessing speech recognition in noise.
  • To investigate the correlation between perceived and measured speech-in-noise abilities.
  • To examine the relationship between pure-tone thresholds, quiet speech recognition, and speech-in-noise performance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU-6) word lists.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presented words in multitalker babble at various signal-to-babble ratios (24 to 0 dB).
  • Employed both descending and random presentation level protocols for psychometric function determination.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant difference was found between the descending and random presentation level protocols.
    • A weak correlation existed between pure-tone thresholds and speech-in-babble performance.
    • A tenuous relationship was observed between quiet speech recognition and speech-in-babble performance.
    • Listener's perceived ability to understand speech in noise showed minimal relation to measured performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Both descending and random presentation level protocols yield comparable results for speech-in-noise testing.
    • Subjective perception of speech-in-noise ability is not a reliable predictor of objective performance.
    • Standard audiological measures (pure-tone thresholds, quiet recognition) have limited predictive value for speech-in-noise challenges.