Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Performance evaluation, part 3: Communicating with employees in the evaluation process
1Boardman Law Firm, 1 South Pinckney Street, P.O. Box 927, Madison, WI 53701-0927, USA. rgregg@boardmanlawfirm.com
Abstract:
In the first of three articles (MPM 2005; Vol. 20 #5: 229-232), the author reviewed the broad concept of performance evaluation, defined the term validity in the evaluation process as a standard derived from court decisions, and detailed objective criteria that managers should follow in rating employees. The second article (MPM 2005; Vol. 21 #1: 21-26) stressed the development of standards, cited examples applicable to daily practice, and detailed errors that are commonly made in rating personnel. This last article covers the very important topic of communicating the results of performance evaluation with employees.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Negative and Positive Feedback
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation