Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequencing errors and molecular evolutionary analysis.

A G Clark1, T S Whittam

  • 1Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correlated Gene Copy Number Changes in a Seminal Fluid Protein Network in <i>Drosophila</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

The influence of open-top chambers on the growth and development of field bean.

The New phytologist·2021
Same author

Sex-ratio meiotic drive and interspecific competition.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Using next-generation RNA sequencing to identify imprinted genes.

Heredity·2014
Same author

Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Heredity·2014
Same author

Evidence for horizontal and vertical transmission in Campylobacter passage from hen to her progeny.

Journal of food protection·2012

Sequencing errors impact evolutionary studies, especially for low-diversity organisms like humans. Minimizing these errors is crucial for accurate genetic analyses and understanding evolutionary history.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships relies on high-quality sequence data.
  • Sequencing errors can introduce noise, potentially biasing evolutionary inferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of sequencing errors on key evolutionary metrics.
  • To assess the required sequencing accuracy for different organisms based on their nucleotide diversity.

Main Methods:

  • Heuristic approaches were employed to model and analyze the effects of sequencing errors.
  • Simulations were likely used to test various error rates and their influence on evolutionary parameters.
  • GenBank error correction data was analyzed to understand error patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Low error rates (<1 nucleotide/kb) generally have minimal impact on highly polymorphic species (e.g., Drosophila, E. coli).
  • Organisms with low nucleotide diversity (e.g., humans) necessitate higher sequencing accuracy to avoid biased evolutionary conclusions.
  • Sequencing errors exhibit non-random patterns, as indicated by GenBank correction data.

Conclusions:

  • The impact of sequencing errors is context-dependent, varying with organismal nucleotide diversity.
  • Achieving high sequencing accuracy is critical for reliable evolutionary studies in low-diversity populations.
  • Understanding non-random error patterns can inform strategies for error mitigation in genomic data.