Related Experiment Videos
Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison
Russell A Epstein1, J Stephen Higgins, Whitney Parker
1Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6241, USA. epstein@psych.upenn.edu
Neuropsychologia
|November 24, 2005
Summary
Face inversion (FIE) impairs recognition more than scene inversion. Both upright and inverted faces/scenes shift processing to generic object mechanisms, but only face inversion reliably impacts behavior.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Face recognition is uniquely susceptible to inversion (face inversion effect, FIE).
- Specialized processing for environmental scenes is suggested but not empirically confirmed via inversion effects.
- Previous research indicates distinct neural pathways for faces and scenes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether scene inversion elicits a behavioral and neural effect comparable to face inversion.
- To compare the neural correlates of face and scene inversion using neuroimaging.
- To determine if inversion shifts processing from specialized to generic object recognition mechanisms for both faces and scenes.
Main Methods:
- Behavioral continuous visual matching task assessing face and scene recognition under upright and inverted conditions.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine neural responses in object- and scene-selective brain regions.
- Whole-brain analysis to identify regions differentially activated by upright versus inverted stimuli.
Main Results:
- Both face and scene inversion induced behavioral penalties, though the scene inversion effect was less robust and diminished over time.
- Scene inversion increased neural activity in the lateral occipital (LO) area and decreased it in the parahippocampal place area (PPA).
- Face inversion increased activity in LO and the right middle fusiform (MF) area but did not alter fusiform face area (FFA) response, suggesting a shift from specialized to generic processing.
Conclusions:
- Both face and scene inversion shift visual processing towards more general object recognition mechanisms.
- This shift results in a reliable behavioral deficit specifically for face recognition, not scene recognition.
- The findings highlight differential sensitivity to inversion between face and scene processing pathways.