Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Algorithms for selecting informative marker panels for population assignment.

Noah A Rosenberg1

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, Bioinformatics Program, and the Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2218, USA. rnoah@umich.edu

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|November 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Clumppling 2.0</i>: A Clustering Alignment Program for Population Structure Analyses.

Human population genetics and genomics·2026
Same author

Reflections on the Human Genome Diversity Project: a conversation with Marcus W. Feldman, Henry T. Greely, and Mary-Claire King.

Genetics·2026
Same author

Enumeration of rooted binary perfect phylogenies.

Discrete applied mathematics (Amsterdam, Netherlands : 1988)·2025
Same author

Tree Height and the Asymptotic Mean of the Colijn-Plazzotta Rank of Unlabeled Binary Rooted Trees.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Toward minimal SNP sets for record-matching with CODIS STR profiles.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2025
Same author

Coalescent theory of the ψ directionality index.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025

Selecting informative genetic markers improves population origin prediction. New multivariate algorithms, greedy and maximin, offer efficient marker panel selection, achieving high accuracy across diverse species like dogs and humans.

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Genomic Analysis
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Predicting an individual's origin from its genotypes relies on selecting informative genetic markers.
  • Univariate methods for marker selection may not yield the most accurate predictive panels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a univariate marker selection procedure with novel multivariate greedy and maximin algorithms.
  • To evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of different marker panel selection strategies across eight species.

Main Methods:

  • Genotyping data from eight species (carp, cat, chicken, dog, fly, grayling, human, maize) were analyzed.
  • Compared univariate accumulation procedure with multivariate greedy and maximin algorithms for marker panel selection.
  • Assessed assignment accuracy of simulated individuals to their source populations using selected marker panels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All tested methods achieved high assignment accuracy (≥94%) with sufficient markers across most species.
  • The greedy algorithm often included loci not selected by other methods, showing slightly higher accuracy.
  • Species-specific marker requirements varied, with dogs needing few (3) and humans requiring more (13-16) markers.

Conclusions:

  • Multivariate algorithms provide substantial improvements over random marker selection for population assignment.
  • Greedy and maximin algorithms are suitable for practical use, selecting panels with near-optimal performance.
  • The choice of marker selection algorithm impacts predictive accuracy, with greedy methods showing a slight advantage.