Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and evolutionary distance estimation.

Michael S Rosenberg1

  • 1Center for Evolutionary Functional Genomics, The Biodesign Institute, and the School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. msr@asu.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|November 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allometric constraints and the modulation of weapon evolution by mating system in fiddler crabs.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025
Same author

Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology.

BMC biology·2025
Same author

A systematic review of diagnostic and interventional techniques in non-occlusive hepatic artery hypoperfusion syndrome.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2024
Same author

Effects of urban-induced mutations on ecology, evolution and health.

Nature ecology & evolution·2024
Same author

Insight into the adaptive role of arachnid genome-wide duplication through chromosome-level genome assembly of the Western black widow spider.

The Journal of heredity·2024
Same author

MetaWin 3: open-source software for meta-analysis.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2024
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Adding a third sequence to pairwise alignment improves accuracy when positioned strategically, not intermediately. Evolutionary distance estimation in multiple sequence alignment is sensitive to sequence placement, not alignment accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Comparative Genomics
  • Phylogenetic Analysis

Background:

  • Sequence alignment is crucial in bioinformatics and comparative genomics.
  • The assumption that multiple sequence alignment (MSA) outperforms pairwise alignment is rarely tested rigorously.
  • Simulation analysis offers a controlled method to evaluate MSA benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the assumption that MSA improves alignment accuracy over pairwise alignment.
  • To investigate how the phylogenetic position of a third sequence affects initial pairwise alignment accuracy.
  • To analyze the impact of sequence placement on estimated evolutionary distances.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized sequence simulation to control evolutionary parameters.
  • Introduced a third sequence into simulated pairwise alignments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied the phylogenetic position of the third sequence relative to the initial pair.

    • Main Results:

    • Maximal alignment accuracy gain occurred when the third sequence subdivided a phylogenetic branch, not when it was intermediate.
    • Evolutionary distance estimation was highly dependent on the third sequence's position, not alignment accuracy.
    • Closer placement of the third sequence to the root inflated estimated distances between the initial pair.

    Conclusions:

    • The greedy progressive algorithm in MSA introduces bias in evolutionary distance estimation.
    • Strategic selection of new sequences for alignment is critical, especially with limited sequencing resources.