Secret agents: inferences about hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants

R Saxe1, J B Tenenbaum, S Carey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. saxe@mit.edu

Psychological Science
|November 30, 2005
PubMed

Insights

Preverbal infants understand that human actions, not inanimate objects, cause motion. They infer hidden agents, but not if the object can move on its own.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Infant Psychology
  • Causality Perception

Background:

  • Preverbal infants associate physical contact with object motion.
  • Limited research exists on infants' understanding of causal agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate infants' expectations regarding the source of causal power for object motion.
  • To determine if infants infer hidden causal agents based on motion events.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted with 10- and 12-month-old infants.
  • Infants observed scenarios involving moving inanimate objects and potential causal agents (human hand vs. inanimate object).
  • Behavioral responses were recorded to assess expectations and inferences.

Main Results:

  • Infants expected a human hand, not an inanimate object, to cause an inanimate object's motion.
  • Infants inferred a hidden causal agent even without direct perceptual evidence.
  • This inference was absent if the object demonstrated self-generated motion previously.

Conclusions:

  • Infants possess nuanced expectations about the sources of causality.
  • Early in development, infants attribute agency to humans for initiating object motion.
  • Infants differentiate between externally caused and self-generated motion, adjusting causal inferences accordingly.

Related Concept Videos

The Nativist Approach01:21

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

The sensorimotor stage, the initial phase of Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, spans the first two years of a child's life. During this period, infants actively engage with their surroundings, building cognitive awareness through direct interaction with the world. This interaction is primarily based on sensory perception and motor actions, allowing infants to gradually understand basic physical properties and predict how objects interact within their environment.
Exploration...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...