Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice.

Charles G Greenough¹

¹Consultant Spinal Surgeon, James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, TS4 3BW Middlesbrough, UK. Charles.Greenough@stees.nhs.uk

European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society

|November 30, 2005

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Do L5 and s1 nerve root compressions produce radicular pain in a dermatomal pattern?

Spine·2013

Same author

Reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing cauda equina syndrome.

British journal of neurosurgery·2010

Same author

EMG analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risk of low-back pain.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2010

Same author

Short-term prospective memory deficits in chronic back pain patients.

Psychosomatic medicine·2007

Same author

Back related outcome assessment instruments.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2005

Same author

The value of electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in discriminating between chronic-low-back-pain sufferers and normal subjects.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2004

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Choosing the right outcome assessment tools for spinal surgery can be complex. This study offers simple data collection strategies for surgeons to gather valuable information for practice improvement and patient care.

Area of Science:

Spinal Surgery
Outcome Assessment
Health Informatics

Background:

Selecting appropriate instruments for assessing outcomes in spinal surgery presents a significant challenge.
The complexity of available assessment tools can hinder routine clinical practice and data collection.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose simplified data collection strategies for spinal surgery outcome assessment.
To guide surgeons in choosing relevant data sets for various practice needs.

Main Methods:

Review of existing outcome assessment instruments in spinal surgery.
Development of recommendations for streamlined data collection based on specific clinical purposes.

Main Results:

Identification of key data set requirements for personal audit, clinical governance, benchmarking, patient selection, and business planning.

Related Experiment Videos

Proposal of concise data sets suitable for day-to-day spinal surgery practice.

Conclusions:

Simple, purpose-driven data collection strategies can provide valuable insights for spinal surgeons.
Implementing recommended data sets can enhance practice management and ultimately benefit patient outcomes.