Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage?

Stephen H Butler1, Monika Harvey

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. s.butler@psy.gla.ac.uk

Neuroreport
|December 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Alcántara Montero: Towards a unified paradigm: chronic pain and functional somatic disorders.

Pain·2026
Same author

Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Spatial Neglect: A Systematic Review.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

NeuroFM: Toward Precision Neuroimaging with Foundation Models for Individualized Brain Health Estimation.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Strategy and Motivation, Rather Than Fatigue, Drive Age-Related Differences in Sustained Attention Performance: Evidence for Decoupled Beta-Band Oscillations.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Age differences in motivation drive performance during the sustained attention to response task.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Can the pain field learn from the functional somatic disorder field?

Pain·2025
Same journal

Electroacupuncture alleviates neuroinflammation and promotes recovery of neurological functions after intracerebral hemorrhage by modulating α7nAChR/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Non-cell-autonomous regulation of Bhlhb5 expression in cortical projection neurons by GABAergic interneuron development and position.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 mediates inflammatory response via NLRP3 inflammasome and neuron damage after traumatic brain injury.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Methyltransferase-like 14 alleviates neuronal ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease by regulating the peroxiredoxin 6/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Hand mental rotation reaction time reflects motor imagery strategy and predicts changes in finger dexterity after motor imagery.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Functional exploration of metabotropic glycine receptors in cultured rat hippocampal slices.

Neuroreport·2026
See all related articles

The right hemisphere is crucial for facial processing. This study shows participants relied on the left face side for gender decisions, even with inverted faces, challenging theories that inversion negates right-hemisphere advantages.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The right hemisphere of the brain demonstrates a superior ability in processing facial information.
  • Chimeric stimuli, composed of two different facial halves, are used to investigate hemispheric contributions to face perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of the right hemisphere in processing facial gender information using chimeric stimuli.
  • To determine if the right hemisphere's advantage in face processing persists with inverted facial stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed chimeric faces (male/female, female/male) and made gender judgments.
  • The effect of face inversion on the left-face bias was examined.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A significant left-face bias was observed in gender decisions for both upright and inverted chimeric faces.
  • The left-face bias was reduced but still present for inverted faces.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that the right hemisphere's influence on face processing is not eliminated by face inversion.
  • The persistence of the left-face bias with inverted chimeric stimuli challenges the notion that inversion abolishes right-hemisphere superiority for faces.