Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Perinatal outcomes and the use of oral hypoglycemic agents
Anna Maria Bertini1, Jean Carl Silva, Wladimir Taborda
1Obstetrics Department, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
Insulin, glyburide, and acarbose were compared for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment. Glyburide showed better glucose control than acarbose but increased risks of large for gestational age infants and neonatal hypoglycemia.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Neonatal Medicine
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requires effective management to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes.
- Oral antihyperglycemic agents are increasingly considered as alternatives to insulin for GDM treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare neonatal outcomes in GDM patients treated with insulin, glyburide, or acarbose.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glyburide and acarbose versus insulin in GDM management.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 70 GDM patients requiring pharmacologic therapy.
- Patients were randomized into three groups: insulin (n=27), glyburide (n=24), and acarbose (n=19).
- Neonatal outcomes including glucose control, birth weight, LGA, and hypoglycemia were assessed.
Main Results:
- Glyburide achieved glucose control in 79.2% of patients, while acarbose achieved it in 57.9%.
- No significant differences were found in fasting/post-prandial glucose or average newborn weight across groups.
- The rate of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses was higher with glyburide (25%) and acarbose (10.5%) compared to insulin (3.7%).
- Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred in 6 of 8 newborns in the glyburide group.
Conclusions:
- Glyburide and acarbose show potential as alternative GDM therapies.
- Glyburide demonstrated superior glucose control compared to acarbose.
- Glyburide use was associated with increased rates of macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycemia.
Objective:
To compare neonatal results from patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who were treated with insulin, glyburide and acarbose.
Results:
Seventy patients diagnosed with GDM who needed therapy to complement diet and physical activities were included in the study. One group was assigned to insulin therapy (n = 27), a second group was assigned to glyburide therapy (n = 24) and a third group was assigned to acarbose therapy (n = 19). Maternal characteristics were similar in the three groups. Glucose control was not achieved in five (20.8%) of the patients using glyburide and in eight (42.1%) of patients using acarbose. No statistical difference was observed in fasting and post-prandial glucose levels or in average newborn weight in the three groups. The rate of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses was 3.7, 25 and 10.5% in the groups treated with insulin, glyburide and acarbose, respectively. Neonatal hypoglycemia was observed in eight newborns, six of which from the glyburide group.
Conclusion:
We believe that glyburide and acarbose can be promising alternative therapies for the treatment of GDM. Glyburide controlled glucose levels in most patients and it was more efficient than acarbose. Glyburide showed a higher rate of macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycemia as compared to other therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility, suggesting a...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are typically...