Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informal medicine: ethical analysis.

F J Leavitt1, R Peleg, A Peleg

  • 1The Centre for Asian and International Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. yeruham@bgumail.bgu.ac.il

Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary lactase deficiency and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2019
Same author

Microarray analysis has no additional value in fetal aberrant right subclavian artery: description of 268 pregnancies and systematic literature review.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2018
Same author

Does primary lactase deficiency reduce bone mineral density in postmenopausal women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2018
Same author

Familial bilateral congenital absence of the flexor pollicis longus.

The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2018
Same author

Traditional Cautery for Medical Treatment Among the Bedouins of Southern Israel.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2015
Same author

Screening tests among family doctors: do we do as we preach?

Public health·2013
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Informal medical consultations can be ethical if no payment is involved and patients understand the risks. Each case requires individual ethical assessment by the physician.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Professional Responsibility

Background:

  • Physicians sometimes provide informal medical consultations without formal record-keeping or follow-up.
  • The ethical implications of such informal practices are often unclear to practitioners.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical permissibility of informal medical consultations.
  • To establish criteria for determining the ethical acceptability of informal medical advice.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of informal medicine based on core ethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and caring.
  • Consideration of various clinical settings where informal consultations may occur.

Main Results:

  • No universal ethical judgment can be made for all informal medical practices.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethicality hinges on factors like patient awareness of risks, absence of payment, and potential harm to patient or community.

    • Conclusions:

    • Informal consultations are permissible when risks are disclosed, no payment is involved, and no harm is foreseen.
    • Physicians must prioritize patient safety and public health, refusing or reporting cases with potential danger or significant community risk.
    • Physicians may decline requests that impose an unfair burden on their time and resources.