Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual survival time prediction using statistical models.

R Henderson1, N Keiding

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, entr. B, PO Box 2099, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Measurement of Time-Dependent CP Violation in the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of the Top-Quark Production Cross Section and Charge Asymmetry at LHCb.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Targeted degradation of CBP/p300 by CBPD-409 exhibits robust anti-myeloma activity.

Leukemia·2026
Same author

Searches for B^{0}→K^{+}π^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} and B_{s}^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence of the B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}π^{+}γ Decay.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Precision Measurement of CP Violation and Branching Fractions in B^{±}→K_{S}^{0}h^{±} (h=π, K) Decays and Search for the Rare Decay B_{c}^{±}→K_{S}^{0}K^{±}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Statistical models offer population-level insights but cannot accurately predict individual survival times for terminally ill patients. Human survival is too complex for precise single-number predictions, even with advanced statistical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Physician survival predictions for terminally ill patients are often inaccurate.
  • There is a growing demand for statistical indices to replace clinical guesswork.
  • Statistical models and indices are being explored for prognostic value.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss and illustrate measures for summarizing predictive information from statistical models.
  • To evaluate the utility of statistical models and indices in predicting individual patient survival.
  • To highlight the limitations of statistical predictions in the context of human survival uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical measures for summarizing predictive information.
  • Discussion of the application of statistical models in survival analysis.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustrative examples of statistical summarization techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Statistical models and indices can effectively summarize predictive information at the group or population level.
    • Despite advancements, precise single-number predictions for individual patient survival remain unreliable.
    • The inherent uncertainty in human survival limits the practical use of statistical predictions for individuals.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistical tools are valuable for understanding survival trends in populations.
    • Individual survival prediction remains a significant challenge due to biological and external factors.
    • Over-reliance on statistical models for individual prognostication should be approached with caution.