Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.

Stephane Heritier1, Val Gebski, Avinesh Pillai

  • 1National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. stephane.heritier@ctc.usyd.edu.au

Statistics in Medicine
|December 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HSP47 is a potential dual cell target and prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer.

Oncogene·2026
Same author

Semiparametric accelerated failure time models with time-varying covariates under partly interval censoring.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE PRRT and CAPTEM chemotherapy for pancreas and small bowel neuroendocrine tumours: The AGITG CONTROL NETS Multi-centre randomized trial.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

βIII-tubulin can act as a brake on extrinsic apoptosis in pancreatic cancer.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Unveiling novel biomarkers for diabetes-related complications through large-scale proteomics analysis: A FIELD sub-study.

Journal of diabetes and its complications·2026
Same author

Adverse event profile following maintenance olaparib in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer in the phase III SOLO2 trial.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a modified Dynamic Balancing Randomization (DBR) method for clinical trials. This approach improves treatment allocation balance across prognostic factors while preserving randomness, enhancing trial efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Design

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials require balanced treatment allocation across prognostic factors for efficient comparisons.
  • Existing randomization methods (e.g., permuted blocks, minimization, biased coin) treat all strata equally.
  • Dynamic Balancing Randomization (DBR) allows differential imbalance levels across strata, ensuring conditional balance while maintaining randomness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a modified Dynamic Balancing Randomization (DBR) approach.
  • To incorporate marginal balance maintenance for important strata within the DBR framework.
  • To evaluate the performance of the modified DBR compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • A modification to the original Dynamic Balancing Randomization (DBR) method was developed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was assessed using a loss function (imbalance vector norm) and a forcing index (randomness measure).
  • Simulations were conducted comparing the modified DBR with minimization and biased coin designs in two trial scenarios.

    • Main Results:

    • The modified DBR aims to achieve better balance across key prognostic factors.
    • The study quantifies the trade-off between balance and randomness using defined performance measures.
    • Simulations provide comparative data on the efficacy of DBR against other randomization techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The modified DBR offers a flexible approach to treatment allocation in clinical trials.
    • This method enhances the efficiency of comparisons by ensuring balance across critical prognostic variables.
    • DBR provides a valuable alternative for complex trial designs requiring nuanced randomization strategies.