Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variability in observer performance studies experimental observations.

David Gur1, Howard E Rockette, Glenn S Maitz

  • 1Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180, USA. gurd@upmc.edu

Academic Radiology
|December 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training AI to Improve Distinction of Triple-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer from Cysts and Fibroadenomas on Ultrasound.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Evaluation of In Vitro Efficiency of Ciclopirox Against <i>Yersinia pestis</i> and <i>Francisella tularensis</i>.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Pfirrmann Grading and Features of Internal Derangement Identified in Discs Studied by Lumbar Discography in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2025
Same author

Screening for Breast Cancer with Contrast-enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI: SCEMAM Trial Results.

Radiology·2025
Same author

STOPPING RULES FOR LONG TERM CLINICAL TRIALS BASED ON TWO CONSECUTIVE: REJECTIONS OF THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.

Communications in statistics: theory and methods·2025
Same author

Novel Bivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine for Highly Effective Protection against Pneumonic Plague.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same journal

Homogeneity of Liver Fat Distribution Serves as a Diagnostic Marker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

MRI-based Predictors and Risk Constellations of Chronic Ankle Instability After Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Multicenter Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using a Longitudinal US-based Stack-model.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Embolization on Outcomes in Iliopsoas Hematomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Presets In Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting CT Angiography of Patients with Total Knee Endoprosthesis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Learning for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection on Routine Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Meta-analysis of Patient-level Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Observer variability significantly impacts study conclusions in radiologist performance studies. Understanding variance components is crucial for appropriate study design and interpreting results accurately.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Analysis
  • Observer Performance Studies

Background:

  • Observer performance studies are essential for evaluating diagnostic accuracy.
  • Variability in observer performance can influence study outcomes and conclusions.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-type studies are commonly used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess variance components in observer performance studies.
  • To evaluate the impact of individual observers on study results and conclusions.
  • To determine the appropriateness of study design based on variance estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of two retrospective ROC-type observer performance studies.
  • Application of the Beiden, Wagner, and Campbell nine-component model to estimate variance components.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimation of case-, reader-, and mode-related variance components, including reader exclusion analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Radiologists performed significantly better with conventional films compared to workstation reading (P < .05).
    • Reader variability was a substantial component of overall variance, particularly for workstation reading.
    • Individual reader performance significantly affected overall study conclusions and reader-by-mode variability.

    Conclusions:

    • Variance component analysis provides insights into study design suitability.
    • Estimates of variance components highlight the sensitivity of results to individual observer inclusion or exclusion.
    • Understanding observer variability is critical for robust and reliable findings in diagnostic performance studies.