Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Orbital floor restoration.

Claudio Rinna1, Claudio Ungari, Andrea Saltarel

  • 1University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Rome, Italy. claudiosub@tiscalinet.it

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Partial Ear Reconstruction Using Septal Cartilage Graft and Skin Expansion.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Challenging reconstruction of oncologic defects of the parotid region: a single-institution experience and decision-making framework proposal.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Neck Management in Malignant Parotid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of Elective Neck Dissection Indications and Outcomes.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Lipofilling of the Upper Eyelid for Patients Affected by Facial Nerve Palsy.

Annali italiani di chirurgia·2025
Same author

High Field MRI in Parotid Gland Tumors: A Diagnostic Algorithm.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Bone-flap-harvest-related donor site morbidity in reconstructive jaw microsurgery: Retrospective analysis based on 220 patients over a ten-year period.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2024
Same journal

Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Asian Patients.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic Transcaruncular Approach for Early Anterior Ethmoidal Artery Cauterization in Large Olfactory Groove Meningioma Surgery: Intraoperative Video.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Clinical Manifestation of Congenital Unilateral Lower Lip Palsy: A Study of 111 Patients.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Racial and Regional Differences of the Cheek for Facial Feminization: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

A Comparative Study Between the Modified Septal Extension Graft Based on the L-Strut Septum and the Costal Cartilage Graft Based on an Intact Native Septum in Nasal Plasty.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Does Angular Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus Alter Fracture Patterns Compared With the Modifications of Posnick, Wolford, and Hunsuck/Epker?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

This study reviewed materials for orbital floor reconstruction, comparing autogenous grafts and alloplastic materials in 379 patients. Alloplastic materials offer advantages in availability and ease of use for blowout fracture repair.

Area of Science:

  • Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Orbital blow-out fractures require reconstruction to restore orbital floor integrity and prevent complications.
  • Historically, autogenous grafts were preferred, but alloplastic materials are increasingly utilized.
  • Evaluating reconstructive materials is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review materials used in orbital floor reconstruction at the University of Rome.
  • To assess biocompatibility, shaping features, and mechanical properties of these materials.
  • To analyze outcomes in patients treated for orbital blow-out fractures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 379 patients treated between 1995 and 2003.
  • Diagnosis confirmed via clinical symptoms and CT scans with coronal reconstruction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 8 years.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparison of autogenous grafts versus various alloplastic materials.
    • Assessment of material performance based on clinical and radiological outcomes.
    • Data analysis focused on biocompatibility, handling, and mechanical stability.

    Conclusions:

    • Alloplastic materials present viable alternatives to autogenous grafts in orbital floor reconstruction.
    • Material selection should consider biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surgical handling.
    • Further research may refine alloplastic material applications for blowout fractures.