Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

E Poljac1, B Neggers, A V van den Berg

  • 1Functional Neurobiology, Helmholtz Institute, Padualaan 8, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Experimental Brain Research
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional MRI of visual cortex predicts training-induced recovery in stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021
Same author

Impaired visual competition in patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Visual perception of axes of head rotation.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2013
Same author

Transfer effects of training-induced visual field recovery in patients with chronic stroke.

Topics in stroke rehabilitation·2012
Same author

Oculomotor behavior of hemianopic chronic stroke patients in a driving simulator is modulated by vision training.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
Same author

Effects of vision restoration training on early visual cortex in patients with cerebral blindness investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Journal of neurophysiology·2010

Human perception of vertical object motion is precise and unbiased, unlike horizontal motion which shows bias. Somatosensory cues enhance visual judgment of impending impacts.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Human perception of horizontal object trajectories is precise but biased away from straight ahead, potentially misjudging collision courses.
  • Approach within the horizontal plane (plane of regard) is unique, differing from motions with perpendicular components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate three-dimensional motion perception near the head, including vertical components.
  • Determine if tactile and proprioceptive information influences precision and bias in judging vertical trajectories.
  • Compare perceptual judgments with visuo-motor pointing tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed perceptual tasks judging vertical impact points (below/above facial reference points) and visuo-motor tasks (pointing to impact locations).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tactile and proprioceptive feedback about facial reference points were provided.
  • Trajectories varied in distance, fixation direction, and intersection with the plane of regard.

    • Main Results:

    • Precision of vertical motion judgment was high and unaffected by distance or fixation direction.
    • Tactile and proprioceptive information significantly improved precision for vertical judgments.
    • Virtually no bias was observed for vertical motion perception or pointing.
    • Horizontal pointing tasks showed overestimation of impact eccentricity (1.7 cm).
    • Pointing tasks for depth perception at the plane of regard showed overestimation (approx. 3 cm).
    • Perceptual task precision increased when trajectories intersected the plane of regard, but pointing task performance did not.

    Conclusions:

    • Different cues are likely used for judging vertical versus horizontal components of approaching object trajectories.
    • Somatosensory signals play a role in the visual judgment of impending impacts.
    • Perceptual and visuo-motor judgments of motion differ, particularly concerning the plane of regard and depth perception.