Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task switching and action sequencing.

Stefanie Schuch1, Iring Koch

  • 1Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Munich, Germany. s.schuch@bangor.ac.uk

Psychological Research
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

Task switching may not impact late response processes, but it does affect action sequencing. Actions from different tasks are less likely to be performed in immediate succession, suggesting higher-order control interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Investigating the cognitive mechanisms underlying task switching is crucial for understanding executive functions.
  • Late response processes, occurring after response selection, are key to understanding the temporal dynamics of cognitive control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if task switching influences late response processes, specifically the interresponse interval (IRI).
  • To examine how task switching affects the sequential execution of actions.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed sequences of two responses under task-switch and task-repetition conditions.
  • The interresponse interval (IRI) was measured as an indicator of late response processes.
  • Stimulus-onset asynchrony was manipulated to assess response sequencing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The IRI was longer in the task-switch condition compared to the task-repetition condition.
  • Task switching reduced the tendency to perform two responses as a sequence.
  • Evidence suggests task switching affects action sequencing rather than solely late response processes.

Conclusions:

  • Task switching does not provide unequivocal evidence for affecting late response processes.
  • Task switching demonstrably impacts action sequencing, making actions from different tasks less likely to form a sequence.
  • Task switching likely interacts with higher-order control processes beyond the scope of traditional paradigms.