Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac rehabilitation
Rajesh Venkataraman1, Bonnie Sanderson, Vera Bittner
1Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA, USA.
Insights
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) benefits patients with coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite higher risks, CKD patients show similar CR improvements in risk factors and health status compared to non-CKD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked to poor outcomes in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients.
- Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves CHD outcomes, but its effect on patients with CKD is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of CR on patients with and without CKD.
- To compare baseline characteristics and CR outcomes between these groups.
Main Methods:
- Compared 115 CKD patients with 261 non-CKD patients who completed CR (1996-2004).
- Utilized t tests and chi2 tests to analyze baseline data and CR outcomes.
- Evaluated changes in clinical/behavioral variables and achievement of secondary prevention goals.
Main Results:
- CKD patients were older with more risk factors, comorbidities, and lower functional capacity.
- Both groups significantly improved diet, weight, lipids, exercise capacity, physical activity, and perceived health.
- Similar proportions achieved secondary prevention goals, though CKD patients retained lower HDL cholesterol and functional capacity.
Conclusions:
- CKD is prevalent in CR participants, associated with high cardiovascular risk.
- CR effectively improves coronary risk profiles in CKD patients, comparable to those without CKD.
Background:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves morbidity and mortality among patients with coronary heart disease, but its impact on patients with concomitant CKD has not been described.
Methods:
We compared baseline characteristics of patients with CKD (calculated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and without CKD who completed CR between 1996 and 2004 using t tests and chi2 tests. CR outcomes were evaluated by comparing the degree of change in clinical and behavioral variables within and between groups with paired and unpaired t testing, respectively, and by comparing the proportion of patients who achieved secondary prevention goals between groups using chi2 testing.
Results:
Among 376 patients, CKD was present in 115 (31%). Patients with CKD were older, had more cardiac risk factors and comorbidities, and had lower functional capacity and perceived health status than patients without CKD. Both groups achieved significant improvements in diet scores, body weight, lipid profiles, 6-minute walk distances, physical activity level, and perceived health status. The proportion of patients who achieved secondary prevention goals was also similar, but patients with CKD continued to have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lower physical component health status summary scores, and lower functional capacity than patients without CKD.
Conclusions:
CKD is common among CR participants. Patients with CKD have a high cardiovascular risk factor and comorbidity burden. CR is as effective in improving coronary risk profiles among patients with CKD as it is among patients with normal renal function.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care