Related Experiment Videos
Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness
1University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. mtdooris@uclan.ac.uk
Health Promotion International
|December 13, 2005
Summary
The settings approach to public health is effective but lacks robust evidence due to evaluation challenges. Future research should focus on theory-based evaluation to capture whole-system benefits.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Promotion
- Systems Science
Background:
- The settings approach, emphasizing ecological perspectives and whole-system change, has been advocated for nearly 20 years.
- Despite its theoretical benefits, a comprehensive evidence base for the effectiveness of the settings approach remains underdeveloped.
- Challenges include constructing evidence, diverse conceptualizations, and the complexity of evaluating whole-system interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the history, theory, and practice of the settings approach in public health.
- To identify reasons for the limited evidence base concerning the effectiveness of this approach.
- To explore pathways for strengthening the evaluation of settings-based health promotion.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of the settings approach in public health.
- Analysis of challenges in evidence generation and evaluation of whole-system interventions.
- Exploration of theory-based evaluation as a potential solution.
Main Results:
- The settings approach views settings as dynamic systems focused on organizational development and change.
- Key challenges hinder the development of a strong evidence base, leading to fragmented project evaluations.
- Current evaluation methods often fail to capture the synergistic benefits of whole-system interventions.
Conclusions:
- Theory-based evaluation holds potential for assessing the added value of whole-system working.
- Moving forward requires addressing funding for evaluation, linking evidence to policy and practice, and clarifying underlying theories.
- Strengthening the evidence base is crucial for the continued development and effective implementation of the settings approach.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:23Methods of Documentation V: CBE
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...